Path: ...!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Idlehands <hidefromu@hushmail.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Subject: Re: How to annoy Chat-GPT
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2024 12:20:29 -0600
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 46
Message-ID: <usni1d$3olg0$1@dont-email.me>
References: <2e3794ebded045315059a4f9d528f160@dizum.com>
 <xn0oj5vc5b8zdxu005@reader.xsnews.nl> <usm0v9$3e6te$1@dont-email.me>
 <usmjii$3hrae$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2024 18:20:29 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="08ff050ffaa7b799241c17a73a4e6270";
	logging-data="3954176"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19BUVH6hbGx+gZkrLrefHCBq8/mReKUapQ="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:g5F2Oj2qVkyyRyIMsFRr52CGydA=
Content-Language: en-GB
In-Reply-To: <usmjii$3hrae$1@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 2614

On 2024-03-11 3:40 a.m., Daniel65 wrote:
> Idlehands wrote on 11/3/24 3:23 pm:
>> On 2024-03-10 10:07 a.m., Blueshirt wrote:
>>> Nomen Nescio wrote:
>>>
>>>> Tell it that AI used to be Machine Learning, and before that it was 
>>>> Big Data. And big data was just anything too large to fit in Excel 
>>>> spreadsheet. So you evolved from Excel. Watch the steam coming out 
>>>> of the ears.
>>>
>>> I don't see why anyone would need Chat-GPT in their lives...
>>
>> Well first of all the person in question does not have a life, does 
>> not relate well to people and has a history of destroying
>> Toastmaster Groups.
> 
> Oh!! Did they kick him out??

It appears they have quietly shut their doors due to members leaving, 
not saying binky is responsible but it is somewhat suspicious.

> 
>> ChatGPT accepts his input without judgement and he can
> 
> Surely you meant "can't"??

Yes, good catch.

> 
>> be bothered to read the result, just cuts and pastes to keep his post
>> count up while claiming to be on topic.
>>
> In the loosest sense of the term, I suppose they are "on topic" but they 
> are not created BY him, so why is he soooo proud on them?? He didn't 
> create them, the BOT did!!
> 
> Oh!! Of course, the All Important Precious Post Count ..... Any Garbage
> will do as long as it's a Post!!

It seems to be his lodestone....

-- 
Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance.

George Bernard Shaw