Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<usqo6h$hubd$3@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: olcott <polcott2@gmail.com> Newsgroups: comp.theory,sci.logic Subject: Re: ZFC solution to incorrect questions: reject them Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2024 18:24:01 -0500 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 51 Message-ID: <usqo6h$hubd$3@dont-email.me> References: <usq5uq$e4sh$1@dont-email.me> <usq715$ed9g$3@dont-email.me> <usq8rh$etp9$1@dont-email.me> <usqb4a$1l201$32@i2pn2.org> <usqcts$froc$1@dont-email.me> <usqh4h$1lvbo$3@i2pn2.org> <usqhoj$gtih$2@dont-email.me> <usql2f$1m5uu$2@i2pn2.org> <usqmdi$hu9o$1@dont-email.me> <usqn3v$i33s$1@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2024 23:24:01 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="aa13334f329e2006d1dfb90f9960e443"; logging-data="588141"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18P9bRpRGS7iWvzzRtAY7Mi" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:zEcXrLUHv5ULG9qENSyq14Sxp3g= In-Reply-To: <usqn3v$i33s$1@dont-email.me> Content-Language: en-US Bytes: 3138 On 3/12/2024 6:05 PM, immibis wrote: > On 12/03/24 23:53, olcott wrote: >> On 3/12/2024 5:30 PM, Richard Damon wrote: >>> On 3/12/24 2:34 PM, olcott wrote: >>>> On 3/12/2024 4:23 PM, Richard Damon wrote: >>>>> On 3/12/24 1:11 PM, olcott wrote: >>>>>> Not exactly. A pair of otherwise identical machines that >>>>>> (that are contained within the above specified set) >>>>>> only differ by return value will both be wrong on the >>>>>> same pathological input. >>>>> >>>>> You mean a pair of DIFFERENT machines. Any difference is different. >>>> >>>> Every decider/input pair (referenced in the above set) has a >>>> corresponding decider/input pair that only differs by the return >>>> value of its decider. >>> >>> Nope. >>> >> ∀ H ∈ Turing_Machines_Returning_Boolean >> ∃ TMD ∈ Turing_Machine_Descriptions | >> Predicted_Behavior(H, TMD) != Actual_Behavior(TMD) >> >> Every H/TMD pair (referenced in the above set) has a >> corresponding H/TMD pair that only differs by the return >> value of its Boolean_TM. >> >> That both of these H/TMD pairs get the wrong answer proves that >> their question was incorrect because the opposite answer to the >> same question is also proven to be incorrect. >> > > Nobody knows what the fuck you are talking about. You have to actually > explain it. The same machine always gives the same return value on the > same input. > It has taken me twenty years to translate my intuitions into words that can possibly understood. A pair of Turing Machines that return Boolean that are identical besides their return value that cannot decide some property of the same input are being asked the same YES/NO question having no correct YES/NO answer. -- Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer