Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<usrn44$rokg$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.mobile.android
Subject: Re: Codes sent by text message
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2024 08:11:48 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 26
Message-ID: <usrn44$rokg$1@dont-email.me>
References: <ush35k$2791b$1@dont-email.me>
 <usid1f$2fqif$1@dont-email.me>
 <su6vbkx86o.ln2@Telcontar.valinor>
 <usj60d$2odtf$1@dont-email.me>
 <1w4pvoyf4iu0k.6b8awc049ol6$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <usmle2$3hp2i$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2024 08:11:48 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="883f01a2a42e4f37e50442b6fea2803c";
	logging-data="909968"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+AsOpQclbMCbwZYIAow3Zk+Vx6NtgOs10="
User-Agent: NewsTap/5.5 (iPhone/iPod Touch)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:89S3N6kumDdGHPTPvajIuLbkz0w=
	sha1:1SIRvjTry26a/NCTFTByzW5JvwA=
Bytes: 2291

Jörg Lorenz <hugybear@gmx.net> wrote:
> On 10.03.24 10:44, Bob Henson wrote:
>> Newyana2 wrote:
>>> At one point I played with crypto a bit. I had to upload a picture
>>> ID (drivers license), as well as giving them my email address and
>>> access to my bank account. As I recall I think they sent a voice
>>> message code to my landline, which is a lot more security in terms of
>>> proof of ID than a cellphone. The lamdline is registered to -- and
>>> wired to -- a physical address.
>> 
>> They will struggle in the UK soon, then. All landlines disappear by the end
>> of 2025  - there will only be VoIP.
> 
> Hardly ever read so much nonsense. We know Newyana does not have a cell 
> phone but he or she wants to have a big mouth in technical groups 
> discussing mobile technology.
> 
> For you: IP-telephone lines are landlines. Landlines are not what you 
> think they are. The backend is even in the UK ip-based for years.

Do you have evidence for that? It's true that UK telephony has been digital
for a long time within the BT network, but that doesn't mean it's
internet/ip-based.