Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<usrope$s2ur$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Dave Royal <dave@dave123royal.com>
Newsgroups: comp.mobile.android
Subject: Re: Codes sent by text message
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2024 08:40:12 +0000 (GMT)
Organization: news.eternal-september.org
Lines: 29
Message-ID: <usrope$s2ur$1@dont-email.me>
References: <ush35k$2791b$1@dont-email.me> <usid1f$2fqif$1@dont-email.me> <su6vbkx86o.ln2@Telcontar.valinor> <usj60d$2odtf$1@dont-email.me> <1w4pvoyf4iu0k.6b8awc049ol6$.dlg@40tude.net> <usmle2$3hp2i$1@dont-email.me> <usrn44$rokg$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2024 08:40:14 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="502928e1e6f66acd8ea6f591df40f94e";
	logging-data="920539"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19e+awJw4zP4BB2EHkcgN8/"
Cancel-Lock: sha1:bMz0VYH6lS4yAiX2piEg/KkBx9k=
X-Newsreader: Mod.PiaoHong.Usenet.Client:2.02.M16
Bytes: 2429

Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> Wrote in message:

> Jörg Lorenz <hugybear@gmx.net> wrote:
>> On 10.03.24 10:44, Bob Henson wrote:
>>> Newyana2 wrote:
>>>> At one point I played with crypto a bit. I had to upload a picture
>>>> ID (drivers license), as well as giving them my email address and
>>>> access to my bank account. As I recall I think they sent a voice
>>>> message code to my landline, which is a lot more security in terms of
>>>> proof of ID than a cellphone. The lamdline is registered to -- and
>>>> wired to -- a physical address.
>>> 
>>> They will struggle in the UK soon, then. All landlines disappear by the end
>>> of 2025  - there will only be VoIP.
>> 
>> Hardly ever read so much nonsense. We know Newyana does not have a cell 
>> phone but he or she wants to have a big mouth in technical groups 
>> discussing mobile technology.
>> 
>> For you: IP-telephone lines are landlines. Landlines are not what you 
>> think they are. The backend is even in the UK ip-based for years.
> 
> Do you have evidence for that? It's true that UK telephony has been digital
> for a long time within the BT network, but that doesn't mean it's
> internet/ip-based. 
> 
BT's System X, installed from the '80s, didn't use packet-switching.
-- 
Remove numerics from my email address.