Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<usscla$vvaq$2@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: olcott <polcott2@gmail.com> Newsgroups: sci.logic Subject: Re: Proving my 2004 claim that some decider/input pairs are incorrect questions Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2024 09:19:22 -0500 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 29 Message-ID: <usscla$vvaq$2@dont-email.me> References: <usppqv$b9av$2@dont-email.me> <usrqij$sfh4$1@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2024 14:19:22 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="aa13334f329e2006d1dfb90f9960e443"; logging-data="1047898"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+24VvOc/y6O/jV3E/6L6Qf" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:DGzemBuOAi2d236wUwsA2M8E5Jg= Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <usrqij$sfh4$1@dont-email.me> Bytes: 2037 On 3/13/2024 4:10 AM, Mikko wrote: > On 2024-03-12 14:45:51 +0000, olcott said: > >> This is my 2004 work that proposes that the halting problem has >> an unsatisfiable specification thus asks an ill-formed question. > > The question "Is the specification of halt decider satisfiable?" > is not ill-formed. > Whenever undecidability is anchored epistemological antinomy that means that the decider is trying to determine whether a self-contradictory expression is true or false. All of these cases are ill-formed. The self-contradictory nature of the halting problem counter-example input makes this input ill-formed. ....14 Every epistemological antinomy can likewise be used for a similar undecidability proof... ....We are therefore confronted with a proposition which asserts its own unprovability. 15 ... (Gödel 1931:43-44) -- Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer