Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<usscou$vvaq$3@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: olcott <polcott2@gmail.com> Newsgroups: sci.logic Subject: Re: ZFC solution to incorrect questions: reject them Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2024 09:21:18 -0500 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 83 Message-ID: <usscou$vvaq$3@dont-email.me> References: <usq5uq$e4sh$1@dont-email.me> <usq715$ed9g$3@dont-email.me> <usq8rh$etp9$1@dont-email.me> <usqb4a$1l201$32@i2pn2.org> <usqcts$froc$1@dont-email.me> <usqh4h$1lvbo$3@i2pn2.org> <usqhoj$gtih$2@dont-email.me> <usql2f$1m5uu$2@i2pn2.org> <usqmdi$hu9o$1@dont-email.me> <usqn3v$i33s$1@dont-email.me> <usqo6h$hubd$3@dont-email.me> <usqp0u$ie7v$1@dont-email.me> <usqq3p$iit2$1@dont-email.me> <usr6pd$1mk0f$4@i2pn2.org> <usr78u$on40$2@dont-email.me> <usrshs$st3i$1@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2024 14:21:19 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="aa13334f329e2006d1dfb90f9960e443"; logging-data="1047898"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX182nOL3EUEr0M0MGvX0bqbJ" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:F+pQ5n98RqzrLy0+2v5i7uSTA2g= Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <usrshs$st3i$1@dont-email.me> Bytes: 4712 On 3/13/2024 4:44 AM, Mikko wrote: > On 2024-03-13 03:41:18 +0000, olcott said: > >> On 3/12/2024 10:33 PM, Richard Damon wrote: >>> On 3/12/24 4:56 PM, olcott wrote: >>>> On 3/12/2024 6:38 PM, immibis wrote: >>>>> On 13/03/24 00:24, olcott wrote: >>>>>> On 3/12/2024 6:05 PM, immibis wrote: >>>>>>> On 12/03/24 23:53, olcott wrote: >>>>>>>> On 3/12/2024 5:30 PM, Richard Damon wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 3/12/24 2:34 PM, olcott wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 3/12/2024 4:23 PM, Richard Damon wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 3/12/24 1:11 PM, olcott wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> Not exactly. A pair of otherwise identical machines that >>>>>>>>>>>> (that are contained within the above specified set) >>>>>>>>>>>> only differ by return value will both be wrong on the >>>>>>>>>>>> same pathological input. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> You mean a pair of DIFFERENT machines. Any difference is >>>>>>>>>>> different. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Every decider/input pair (referenced in the above set) has a >>>>>>>>>> corresponding decider/input pair that only differs by the return >>>>>>>>>> value of its decider. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Nope. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> ∀ H ∈ Turing_Machines_Returning_Boolean >>>>>>>> ∃ TMD ∈ Turing_Machine_Descriptions | >>>>>>>> Predicted_Behavior(H, TMD) != Actual_Behavior(TMD) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Every H/TMD pair (referenced in the above set) has a >>>>>>>> corresponding H/TMD pair that only differs by the return >>>>>>>> value of its Boolean_TM. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> That both of these H/TMD pairs get the wrong answer proves that >>>>>>>> their question was incorrect because the opposite answer to the >>>>>>>> same question is also proven to be incorrect. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Nobody knows what the fuck you are talking about. You have to >>>>>>> actually explain it. The same machine always gives the same >>>>>>> return value on the same input. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> It has taken me twenty years to translate my intuitions into >>>>>> words that can possibly understood. >>>>> >>>>> You failed. >>>>> >>>>>> A pair of Turing Machines that return Boolean that are identical >>>>>> besides their return value that cannot decide some property of >>>>>> the same input are being asked the same YES/NO question having >>>>>> no correct YES/NO answer. >>>>> >>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turing_machine#Formal_definition >>>>> A Turing machine is ⟨Q, Γ, b, Σ, δ, q0, F⟩ >>>>> Show me two ⟨Q, Γ, b, Σ, δ, q0, F⟩ that are identical besides their >>>>> return value. >>>>> You can't because you are talking nonsense. they don't exist. >>>> >>>> Turing machine descriptions that are identical finite strings >>>> except for the the 1/0 that they write the their exact same >>>> tape relative location. >>>> >>> >>> So they aren't identical. >>> >>> "Identical except ..." means DIFFERENT. >>> >>> So you LIE >> >> Not at all. I did not know these details until > ... > > To claim something as truth without knowing it is to lie. > Not it is not, it is being mistaken. Lies are telling known falsehoods with the intention to deceive. -- Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer