Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<ustnk9$1cns3$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: AJL <noemail@none.com> Newsgroups: comp.mobile.android Subject: Re: Samsung account Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2024 19:32:41 -0700 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 56 Message-ID: <ustnk9$1cns3$1@dont-email.me> References: <86il1qmd9v.fsf@example.com> <usso8i.8to.1@ID-201911.user.individual.net> <key-20240313175812@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> <ussp0e$2cg2$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> <ust0b3$149uv$1@dont-email.me> <86y1allws2.fsf@example.com> <ust2v7$14rfd$1@dont-email.me> <86ttl9luim.fsf@example.com> <ust5ik$15eve$1@dont-email.me> <ust9q9$2gae$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> <ustdd7$1772n$1@dont-email.me> <uste5e$1u6h$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> <ustfr7$17lrr$1@dont-email.me> <ustgds$2u3r$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2024 02:32:41 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="7924ef19b6c7f2cfd968be004cf8615a"; logging-data="1466243"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX183osj1gcwKEjXwz38R6tgb" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 Cancel-Lock: sha1:UQ48SG3tBC4WIzxwVI7o+6yKWAA= In-Reply-To: <ustgds$2u3r$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> Bytes: 3742 On 3/13/2024 5:29 PM, Andrew wrote: > AJL wrote on Wed, 13 Mar 2024 17:19:51 -0700 : >> I noticed that you conveniently avoided commenting on your >> un-private online profile (CC, doctor, bank, phone, etc etc.). >> Understood. > Your argument is absurd for two reasons that should have been > obvious. 1. You're comparing the utility of a doctor bank and CC to a > Samsung app? (that's preposterous) Nope. I just said your life is already online and available to hacks if you use those things. > 2. You're assuming I have a CC on my phone, a banking app on my > phone, a credit card on my phone, etc.). I do not. Nor on the > Internet. Nope. Your phone has nothing to do with it. If you use the above services, phone or no phone, your life is online and available to hacks. > If someone wants to hack into that information, they'll have to get > it directly from my doctor, My doctors use 3rd party online sites to carry on business where I can make appointments, see diagnosis, pay co-pays, communicate with their offices, etc. Unless you're seeing country hicks I'll bet yours do too. > So I get it that you're butt hurt that I said you aren't thinking. Using insults instead of facts and logic is a show of poor thinking. > But comparing the utility of a Samsung Account to a Doctor's Visit is > not going to impress me that you're making good decisions. It's just > not. No doctor's visits were mentioned. Only doctor's (and other services) online records > Give me an argument that makes sense and I'm all ears. I did. >> In my case it was mainly a Samsung tablet pop-up stopper with the >> added advantage of having the Samsung app store made available. As >> to privacy, AJL has never complained about its loss to me... > > OK. I still maintain that if you can find something inside the > Samsung Account that is worth the loss of privacy, I'd be all ears if > it made sense (as I asked the same question the first time I got a > Samsung years ago). I explained my reason for opening a fake Samsung account last time. Reread my answer 2 paragraphs above. As to any privacy paranoia, YMMV...