Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!newsfeed.hasname.com!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Andrew <andrew@spam.net>
Newsgroups: comp.mobile.android
Subject: Re: Samsung account
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2024 18:20:18 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: BWH Usenet Archive (https://usenet.blueworldhosting.com)
Message-ID: <usvf4u$2su3$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
References: <86il1qmd9v.fsf@example.com> <usso8i.8to.1@ID-201911.user.individual.net> <key-20240313175812@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> <ussp0e$2cg2$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> <ust0b3$149uv$1@dont-email.me> <86y1allws2.fsf@example.com> <ust2v7$14rfd$1@dont-email.me> <86ttl9luim.fsf@example.com> <ust5ik$15eve$1@dont-email.me> <ust9q9$2gae$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> <ustdd7$1772n$1@dont-email.me> <uste5e$1u6h$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> <ustfr7$17lrr$1@dont-email.me> <usv979.f50.1@ID-201911.user.individual.net>
Injection-Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2024 18:20:18 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com;
	logging-data="95171"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blueworldhosting.com"
User-Agent: Xnews/2009.05.01
Cancel-Lock: sha1:UIXPHC6pwJZ5JYR+a1Rm3CLllxg= sha256:4e7IN/Q6A33tDOv921+OORunJ8TVbJiBV17Av+Dy1eE=
	sha1:1haTkwq468ttHX73I+Z2Cdhr9zg= sha256:u/ZpRHZSvBMW+jG06glpKZd8tXI60fwx0wC822DN+fY=
Bytes: 2764
Lines: 26

Frank Slootweg wrote on 14 Mar 2024 15:39:14 GMT :

>> Gave up? No. I do conceal my ID when possible and/or necessary. And I 
>> noticed that you conveniently avoided commenting on your un-private 
>> online profile (CC, doctor, bank, phone, etc etc.). Understood.
> 
>   Yep. The old trick of ignoring what you can't counter. How pathetic.

I addressed all his issues, Frank, so you're just wrong.

And what's "pathetic" is the (paraphrased) claim that AJL's medical data is
as important as AJL's Samsung app to turn the WI-Fi off - and worse -
they're so equal in AJL's mindset that he feels he MUST store all his
medical data on his phone. 

That is essentially AJL's entire argument - which I find absurd.

AJL then extended that same argument to his credit card and then to his
bank accounts - but the argument that they're as important as a silly
Samsung app that isn't even needed is - is only 1/3rd of what's absurd.

The other 1/3 which is absurd is that AJL just gave up because he considers
all data of equal importance, and the last 1/3rd is as a result, AJL feels
he MUST put all his data on his smartphone (which has no IT department).

That is AJL's argument, paraphrased in a nutshell - which - is pathetic.
But you used the word "pathetic" - whereas I simply claim it's "absurd".