Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<ut24fb$20gq$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!news.misty.com!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Andrew <andrew@spam.net>
Newsgroups: comp.mobile.android
Subject: Re: Samsung account
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2024 18:36:27 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: BWH Usenet Archive (https://usenet.blueworldhosting.com)
Message-ID: <ut24fb$20gq$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
References: <86il1qmd9v.fsf@example.com> <usso8i.8to.1@ID-201911.user.individual.net> <key-20240313175812@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> <ussp0e$2cg2$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> <ust0b3$149uv$1@dont-email.me> <86y1allws2.fsf@example.com> <ust2v7$14rfd$1@dont-email.me> <86ttl9luim.fsf@example.com> <ust5ik$15eve$1@dont-email.me> <ust9q9$2gae$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> <ustdd7$1772n$1@dont-email.me> <uste5e$1u6h$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> <ustfr7$17lrr$1@dont-email.me> <usv979.f50.1@ID-201911.user.individual.net> <usvf4u$2su3$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> <ut0cf0$22t6e$1@dont-email.me> <ut0p8b$15vl$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> <ut0snk$25lcq$1@dont-email.me>
Injection-Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2024 18:36:27 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com;
	logging-data="66074"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blueworldhosting.com"
User-Agent: Xnews/2009.05.01
Cancel-Lock: sha1:hwEPGIElMqG6Kmgilc6/3LQZ9J0= sha256:TQelzi6psN5kCxLjM1BcAssfQFF+b8CkXpkzFUo7oXI=
	sha1:p208p06cZYJ/euVczTnwmIDP0As= sha256:cDosyK32nci4Hv4wX5xjvzYKWyIP+IfMmLi8DXVE98I=
Bytes: 2454
Lines: 17

AJL wrote on Fri, 15 Mar 2024 00:18:11 -0700 :

> Nothing about the importance of my CC compared to the Samsung app in 
> that paragraph.

Idiot. You are like nospam where you own a kindergarten mentality that
doesn't even realize your arguments are preposterously inconsistent.

A. We're discussing the utility of Samsung apps versus loss of privacy.
B. You're the idiot who equated that to bank, cc & medical records.
C. I simply said your comparative argument is preposterously absurd.

If you didn't want to bring the credit cards, banking records and medical
records into the comparison of the utility versus loss of privacy, then
it's your fault for being the child-like idiot who did that. 

You can have the last word since it's you who is the child-like idiot.
(Bring Frank Slootweg along with you since he agreed with your idiocy.)