Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<ut2h6p$2g9l4$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> Newsgroups: comp.lang.c,comp.arch Subject: Re: Radians Or Degrees? Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2024 15:13:44 -0700 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 31 Message-ID: <ut2h6p$2g9l4$1@dont-email.me> References: <ur5trn$3d64t$1@dont-email.me> <ur5v05$3ccut$1@dont-email.me> <20240222015920.00000260@yahoo.com> <ur69j9$3ftgj$3@dont-email.me> <ur86eg$1aip$1@dont-email.me> <ur88e4$1rr1$5@dont-email.me> <ur8a2p$2446$1@dont-email.me> <ur8ctk$2vbd$2@dont-email.me> <20240222233838.0000572f@yahoo.com> <3b2e86cdb0ee8785b4405ab10871c5ca@www.novabbs.org> <ur8nud$4n1r$1@dont-email.me> <936a852388e7e4414cb7e529da7095ea@www.novabbs.org> <ur9qtp$fnm9$1@dont-email.me> <20240314112655.000011f8@yahoo.com> <ut17ji$27n6b$1@dont-email.me> <ut2csb$2fe4u$1@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2024 22:13:45 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="ed612d4ce44e1af227fa0b762e20f588"; logging-data="2631332"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19xwpGX2JXTdCXchrw34uoiOTv/9EqLXkg=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:Qb9Nnhi/ygM9oixcHMk87nTGwO0= Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <ut2csb$2fe4u$1@dont-email.me> Bytes: 2565 On 3/15/2024 1:59 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote: > On 3/15/2024 3:23 AM, Terje Mathisen wrote: >> Michael, I for the main part agree with you here, i.e. calculating >> sin(x) with x larger than 2^53 or so, is almost certainly stupid. > [...] > > ;^D tooooooo big. :^) Actually, I can think of one of my fractals that tries to scale back numbers that get too big. https://www.shadertoy.com/view/XtscDl When a complex number breaches an escape time barrier, my code simply scales it back, say z = z * .242, and tries the fractal again. It has the effect of exploding the fractal out beyond its original boundaries... > > Now, wrt the results, arbitrary precision for trig is useful, in say... > Deep fractal zooms... > > Zooming in really deep in say something like this, well the precision of > trig can become an issue: > > https://paulbourke.net/fractals/multijulia/ > > Trig would be used, say, in rectangular to-from polar forms wrt getting > the n-ary roots of a complex number? >