Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<ut4ie3$3028p$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> Newsgroups: comp.mobile.android Subject: Re: Codes sent by text message Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2024 09:46:57 -0700 Organization: None, as usual Lines: 36 Message-ID: <ut4ie3$3028p$1@dont-email.me> References: <ush35k$2791b$1@dont-email.me> <usmle2$3hp2i$1@dont-email.me> <usrn44$rokg$1@dont-email.me> <lgm8ckxlpl.ln2@Telcontar.valinor> <ust0kr$14c9n$1@dont-email.me> <lb2cckx9mp.ln2@Telcontar.valinor> <ut0qlb$25761$1@dont-email.me> <saodckxjd1.ln2@Telcontar.valinor> <ut1g5i$29b4r$1@dont-email.me> <cjtdckxcca.ln2@Telcontar.valinor> <ut1j4l$2a1sa$1@dont-email.me> <3h7eckxatm.ln2@Telcontar.valinor> <ut273k.9rs.1@ID-201911.user.individual.net> <ut28pf$2ejt9$1@dont-email.me> <ut2ddd.21k.1@ID-201911.user.individual.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2024 16:46:59 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="8907b9c7e594a06ce17d752abdaff17e"; logging-data="3148057"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18HAbNGGvNJtEsAY9bpL150tnn5MQH1Faw=" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/68.0 Thunderbird/68.12.1 Cancel-Lock: sha1:JhhtiRUm4Jbia7n5ZXQxjfh4ybk= Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <ut2ddd.21k.1@ID-201911.user.individual.net> Bytes: 2957 On 3/15/24 1:09 PM, Frank Slootweg wrote: > The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> wrote: >> On 3/15/24 11:21 AM, Frank Slootweg wrote: >> > Exactly! His term "classical TV" didn't mean a thing to me, way t= oo >> > ambiguous. OTOH, I knew what "linear TV" means. >>=20 >> Is it the opposite of logarithmic TV? I've been watching it since 194= 8=20 >> or so and I've never heard that term. OTA? >=20 > It's somewhat reasonably explained in J=F6rg's reference, so I sugge= st > to read that. >=20 > It's 'normal'/'scheduled'/real-time/<whatever> TV as we've always > known it. The transmission technology is not really relevant, so it > covers both OTA and any other method, cable, satellite, etc.. >=20 > I have cable TV, but most of what I watch has been recorded (by me),= > so it's no longer "linear TV". If that hasn't confused you, I have to > try harder, No need, you did a fine job! I was more interested in where the word=20 itself came from as a descriptor of 'original' TV. "Where in hell did THAT usage come from?" frequently stops me in my track= s. --=20 Cheers, Bev "History I believe furnishes no example of a priest-ridden people maintaining a free civil government." -- letter from Thomas Jefferson to Baron vonHumboldt, 1813