Path: ...!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid>
Newsgroups: comp.mobile.android
Subject: Re: No fault cell phone law
Date: 17 Mar 2024 16:27:03 GMT
Organization: NOYB
Lines: 29
Message-ID: <ut793v.nrs.1@ID-201911.user.individual.net>
References: <ut4s0v$9ei$1@toxic.dizum.net> <ut5bef$353ou$2@dont-email.me> <ut5s9m$3bjd7$2@dont-email.me> <MPG.4060b42225f15ccb9902c4@news.individual.net>
X-Trace: individual.net qoqkca08o8zth7UMTVeVqggZF+DiMVBycauWHSCX3XOGW5KHDR
X-Orig-Path: not-for-mail
Cancel-Lock: sha1:EnCCqCWdlFTJpDHvJzuMYItA4ak= sha256:Mt0D40dGmd75vmhdT+jGbgtL43HIY+XzcTgVLbZDZSc=
User-Agent: tin/1.6.2-20030910 ("Pabbay") (UNIX) (CYGWIN_NT-10.0-WOW/2.8.0(0.309/5/3) (i686)) Hamster/2.0.2.2
Bytes: 2069

Stan Brown <the_stan_brown@fastmail.fm> wrote:
> On Sat, 16 Mar 2024 21:41:25 -0700, The Real Bev wrote:
> > On 3/16/24 4:53 PM, pothead wrote:
> > > On 2024-03-16, Thuma <thuma@att.net> wrote:
> > >> Anyone running their mouth on a cell phone and jaywalking should be 
> > >> considered fair game to stop and beat the shit out of them, or just run 
> > >> them over.
> > >>
> > >> It is not the responsibility of automobile drivers with the right-of-way 
> 
> There is no such thing as "an automobile driver with 
> the right of way."
> 
> It's basic driver's ed. You NEVER "have" the right of 
> way. Instead, there are various situations where you 
> must yield the right of way. You only proceed when none 
> of those situations exist.
> 
> One of those situations, of course, is a pedestrian in 
> your path. No matter how heedless or annoying they may 
> be, you have no right to hit them with your vehicle or 
> even drive in a way that threatens to do so.

  The Real Bev severely cut the 'Newsgroups: line (without saying so).
The original list apparently was:

Newsgroups: comp.mobile.android,misc.phone.mobile.iphone,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.society.liberalism,talk.politics.guns

  I think that says enough.