Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<ut9j0o$7bfm$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi>
Newsgroups: sci.lang
Subject: Re: Analytical truth redefined
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2024 16:27:36 +0200
Organization: -
Lines: 16
Message-ID: <ut9j0o$7bfm$1@dont-email.me>
References: <ttednQpP38i-2sL9nZ2dnUU7-K3NnZ2d@giganews.com> <ut954l$4epn$1@dont-email.me> <truth-20240318115016@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="de541a18e063b31fd1582d0fe6c91e1f";
	logging-data="241142"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18Ys+AkQFf7OQcYkCbDnVYQ"
User-Agent: Unison/2.2
Cancel-Lock: sha1:VVtOTAWZtt9pUfpAT2X+4SKwQy4=
Bytes: 1456

On 2024-03-18 10:59:44 +0000, Stefan Ram said:

> Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> wrote or quoted:
>> Truth is not a matter of definition.
> 
>   "Truth" is a word created by humans, so it must have some
>   definition (which might be implicit in the way it's used).
>   People may not agree upon what exactly is the correct definition,
>   but such a disagreement only shows that it's a matter of definition.

Definitions only tell which words we can use for the concept.
They do not tell what is true.

-- 
Mikko