Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<utcrbo$10tck$2@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy Subject: Re: This FOSS Thang :-) Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2024 16:08:24 -0400 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 21 Message-ID: <utcrbo$10tck$2@dont-email.me> References: <uso2en$184pn$1@solani.org> <ug4vui1sog06gsn7r2dep8t32pg539pnc9@4ax.com> <usq48p$dl57$1@dont-email.me> <65f56b31$0$29736$426a74cc@news.free.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2024 20:08:24 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="c4508c826d9e42893ed8b8b4a459aa10"; logging-data="1078676"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/47T10SXNIK8ccG2mrE6kL0/60ZPj/2bo=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:kLNVeE3H6AmH3RNgJ6Y/1Hi0REU= In-Reply-To: <65f56b31$0$29736$426a74cc@news.free.fr> Content-Language: en-US Bytes: 1871 On 3/16/24 5:49 AM, Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote: > Le 12-03-2024, -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> a écrit : >> >> The funny thing about 'bloat' is that it isn't necessarily a bad thing. > > It is. By definition. If it's a bloated application, it means it has > useless complexities. For some tasks you need complexity. It's not > bloated in those cases. > > They are two issues with the bloated applications. First they waste > resources. Second, they are more difficult to maintain than necessary. > Oh, I agree for *real* bloat. Problem is that Feeb is wrong when they tried to claim everything, including necessary security checks, as being "bloat". Any fool can write a fast system that's fast because its fragile. -hh