Warning: mysqli::__construct(): (HY000/1203): User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\includes\artfuncs.php on line 21
Failed to connect to MySQL: (1203) User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections
Warning: mysqli::query(): Couldn't fetch mysqli in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\index.php on line 66
Article <utd76v$2e7rj$1@i2pn2.org>
Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<utd76v$2e7rj$1@i2pn2.org>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: fir <fir@grunge.pl>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: filling area by color atack safety
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2024 00:30:56 +0100
Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID: <utd76v$2e7rj$1@i2pn2.org>
References: <ut3669$21eur$1@i2pn2.org>	<ut4020$2s8ov$1@dont-email.me>	<ut4b09$2uhpm$1@dont-email.me>	<ut4cnc$2ut2t$1@dont-email.me>	<ut70b4$3itvb$1@dont-email.me>	<20240317182520.00002390@yahoo.com>	<utd5in$2e5ok$1@i2pn2.org> <20240320011759.00005e2d@yahoo.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2024 23:30:40 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="2563955"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="+ydHcGjgSeBt3Wz3WTfKefUptpAWaXduqfw5xdfsuS0";
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:27.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/27.0 SeaMonkey/2.24
In-Reply-To: <20240320011759.00005e2d@yahoo.com>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
Bytes: 2588
Lines: 39

Michael S wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Mar 2024 00:03:04 +0100
> fir <fir@grunge.pl> wrote:
>> im not quite sure what you do here.. pass the structure? in fact
>> the thing you name context you may not pass at all just make is
>> standalone static variables becouse they/it is the same for whole
>> "branch" (given recursive branch of recolorisation)
>>
>> something like
>>
>> int old_color = 0xff0000;
>> int new_color = 0x00ff00;
>>
>> void RecolorizePixelAndAdjacentPixels(int x, int y)
>> {
>>     //...
>> }
>>
>>
>
> Not thred-safe.
>
some thread safe as previous, and i just say that thiose new_color and 
old_color in arguments i add for convenience - as those all was 
functional test if the operation of recolorisation visibly works and how 
in my lowres (bigpixel) graphics editor - its no need to pass it
down the stack..also the test if old_color = new color then return
is strictly probably not needed to populate

i also made unnecesary GetPixelSafe - i use two metods liek SetPixelSafe 
just checks if x,y is in array at all ans SetPixelUnsafe
simply frame[y*frame_width+x] = color

so if you were interested in speed comparsions you wouldnt need to pass
structure at all and that will be faster

i agree generally with bot mclean and brown in this discusion
1) its not optimal so its kinda wrong
2) it is simple so its kinda usable and for some uses its handy so
not all accusations of this being wring are justified