Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<uterbi$2g6te$2@i2pn2.org> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!news.misty.com!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: fir <fir@grunge.pl> Newsgroups: comp.lang.c Subject: Re: filling area by color atack safety Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2024 15:20:37 +0100 Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org) Message-ID: <uterbi$2g6te$2@i2pn2.org> References: <ut3669$21eur$1@i2pn2.org> <ut4020$2s8ov$1@dont-email.me> <20240317144625.00002011@yahoo.com> <utd9m5$2eb2n$1@i2pn2.org> <20240320104155.00005b24@yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2024 14:20:35 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: i2pn2.org; logging-data="2628526"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org"; posting-account="+ydHcGjgSeBt3Wz3WTfKefUptpAWaXduqfw5xdfsuS0"; User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:27.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/27.0 SeaMonkey/2.24 In-Reply-To: <20240320104155.00005b24@yahoo.com> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 Bytes: 1968 Lines: 23 Michael S wrote: > On Wed, 20 Mar 2024 01:13:10 +0100 > fir <fir@grunge.pl> wrote: >> >> i asked the topic here as i felt i got no time to rethink if it will >> blow my progranm or not but that 30 minurtes task was for 30 minutes >> not for a multi hour discusion >> > > So you got the answer rather quickly and the answer is: > "Yes, in the worst case it can consume a lot of stack. Don't use this > simple and elegant algorithm unless you have full control both on size > of the images and on size of the stack and on size of the stack frame > generates by compiler for each recursive call." > > ye, may conclusion would here be rather put stack to 100 or even 150 MB and forget... then worry if the code (of recolorisation) work too slow (i know howewer this is potential bug af is someone would want then recolorise of very big area there still would be stack overflow, but this is unlikely)