Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: NBC Historian Takes Media's "Bloodbath" Insanity To A Whole New
 Level
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2024 11:30:40 -0400
Organization: Ph'nglui Mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh Wgah'nagl Fhtagn.
Lines: 139
Message-ID: <utevf0$1iacj$2@dont-email.me>
References: <utbtok$pkre$10@dont-email.me>
 <20240319122424.00002ca9@example.com>
 <EvOdnfeMWpo2RWT4nZ2dnZfqnPGdnZ2d@giganews.com>
 <utctt9$11hfm$1@dont-email.me>
 <atropos-266AD3.15011119032024@g9u1993c-hb.houston.hpicorp.net>
 <utd5p0$1371j$1@dont-email.me>
 <atropos-F34389.17010519032024@g9u1993c-hb.houston.hpicorp.net>
 <utdc9v$14eu2$1@dont-email.me>
 <p6mcnRxmu82A02f4nZ2dnZfqnPidnZ2d@giganews.com>
Reply-To: fredp1571@gmail.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2024 15:30:40 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="205be26fc4f373a82432ea1f9c8f83dd";
	logging-data="1649043"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+F//DSicO3CzoQQHY8Ow9e"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:78.0)
 Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.0
Cancel-Lock: sha1:udxonHpfeuzWiN3QgF1K+7dgwZs=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <p6mcnRxmu82A02f4nZ2dnZfqnPidnZ2d@giganews.com>
Bytes: 7270

On 3/19/24 10:46 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> super70s <super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:
>> On 2024-03-20 00:01:05 +0000, BTR1701 said:
>>
>>> In article <utd5p0$1371j$1@dont-email.me>,
>>> super70s <super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 2024-03-19 22:01:11 +0000, BTR1701 said:
>>>>
>>>>> In article <utctt9$11hfm$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>>> super70s <super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2024-03-19 18:25:47 +0000, BTR1701 said:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Mar 19, 2024 at 9:24:24 AM PDT, "Rhino"
>>>>>>> <no_offline_contact@example.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Tue, 19 Mar 2024 04:30:48 -0400
>>>>>>>> Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> NBC News presidential historian Michael Beschloss took the media
>>>>>>>>> furor over former President Donald Trump’s "bloodbath" comments to
>>>>>>>>> new heights during a Monday appearance on MSNBC's MORNING JOE.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> During an Ohio campaign rally over the weekend, Trump predicted a
>>>>>>>>> "bloodbath" if he does not win reelection in 2024, and media outlets
>>>>>>>>> fell all over themselves trying to make it look as though he was
>>>>>>>>> predicting politically motivated violence and a *literal* bloodbath.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> And yet there's a Democrat state senator in Tennessee outright calling
>>>>>>> for riots and political violence right now because she didn't get her
>>>>>>> way in a vote and... yes, you guessed it, crickets from the legacy
>>>>>>> media.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Maybe because she isn't powerful enough to inspire upwards of 80,000
>>>>>> followers to attempt a violent insurrection in Washington or even
>>>>>> Nashville.
>>>>>
>>>>> So we have to wait until there's dead bodies in the street and downtown
>>>>> Nashville is on fire before reporting on a state official calling for
>>>>> riots and violence?
>>>>>
>>>>> That's what you're going with?
>>>>
>>>> I couldn't google the specific example of a "Democrat state senator in
>>>> Tennessee outright calling for riots and political violence right now
>>>> because she didn't get her way in a vote"
>>>
>>> Just check out the thread posted right here in RAT today entitled,
>>> "Civility Project Ends".
>>>
>>>> but the Republican jerks in charge have passed some pretty outrageous
>>>> laws in the past few weeks, like repealing an anti-"arrested for driving
>>>> while Black" law
>>>
>>> Otherwise known as an "exempting black people from the traffic code
>>> everyone else has to obey" law.
>>
>> The law (or repealed law now) applies to everyone.
>>
>> If your state has this policy maybe you'll appreciate getting pulled
>> over in your beaten up 40-year-old pickup without a license plate light
>> because some cop makes the subjective judgement that you look
>> suspicious.
> 
> If I'm driving around without a license plate light, then there's nothing
> subjective about it. I'm violating the law.
>>
>>> You do realize that's a violation of the Equal Protection Clause of the
>>> 14th Amendment, right? Or do you just not care?
>>
>> It had nothing to do with the 14th Amendment because it applied to
>> everyone and all races.
> 
> Ah, so it just repealed enforcement of the traffic code full stop because
> "muh racism!"?
> 
>> But your apparent closet racism by assuming it applied to only Blacks
>> is interesting.
> 
> If I assumed anything it's that the Tennessee law was a carbon copy of a
> recent California bill proposed by a black assemblyman from Compton, which
> specifically exempts only blacks from being stopped for most traffic
> infractions, including speeding for anything short of 25mph over the posted
> limit.
> 
> This means if you have some lunatic blasting down a residential street at
> 50mph, the cops would just have to stand by and watch it happen if the
> driver is black.
> 
> The bill would also render any evidence of other crimes discovered during a
> traffic stop inadmissible. So if the speeder in the above hypothetical was
> racing down the residential street at 60mph and could now be legally
> stopped by police, and they discovered a dead murder victim in his back
> seat, the body and any other evidence in the car would be inadmissible in
> court at his murder trial.
> 
> Again, only for blacks.
> 
> So yeah, when these ridiculous laws and policy efforts spring up all around
> the country at roughly the same time, they're usually carbon copies of each
> other sent direct from BLM headquarters.
> 
> Mea culpa.
> 
>>
>>>> that was passed after Tyre Nichols was beaten to death by police in
>>>> 2023 after one of these kind of aggressive traffic stops
>>>
>>> By black cops. But go on with your "But muh racism!" nonsense.
>>>
>>>> and making unauthorized street protests a felony instead of a
>>>> misdemeanor.
>>>
>>> Obviously misdemeanors weren't working.
>>
>> Making street protests felonies isn't going to work either, if the
>> perceived transgression is egregious enough.
>>
>> It's a felony to enter the Capitol Building in an unauthorized manner
> 
> No, it's a misdemeanor. 18 USC 1751, Restricted Buildings and Grounds. The
> same statute I used to lock up White House fence jumpers.
> 
>> and vandalize it and threaten members of Congress, did that work?
> 
> What if the cops held the door open for them. Is that still unauthorized?
> 

Yeah, the Jan 6'ers tried making that argument too.  They're in jail now.

-- 
"Thou shalt not make a machine in the likeness of a man’s mind." - OC 
Bible  25B.G.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/ek8kap93bmk0q5w/D%20U%20N%20E%20Part%20II.jpg?dl=0

Gracie, age 6.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/0es3xolxka455iw/BetterThingsToDo.jpg?dl=0