Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: NBC Historian Takes Media's "Bloodbath" Insanity To A Whole New
 Level
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2024 06:57:24 -0400
Organization: Ph'nglui Mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh Wgah'nagl Fhtagn.
Lines: 65
Message-ID: <utjo6m$2sijg$1@dont-email.me>
References: <utbtok$pkre$10@dont-email.me>
 <p6mcnRxmu82A02f4nZ2dnZfqnPidnZ2d@giganews.com>
 <utdl0p$19mot$1@dont-email.me>
 <6NydnWwGgNc0xWf4nZ2dnZfqn_udnZ2d@giganews.com>
 <utfn65$1nrjb$1@dont-email.me>
 <J_SdnRPRtZzf6mb4nZ2dnZfqnPWdnZ2d@giganews.com>
 <17bea7625eadf0f8$300665$2218499$46d50c60@news.newsdemon.com>
 <uthi9p$29328$6@dont-email.me>
 <17bed5b715bf3f58$7434$1098985$c8d58268@news.newsdemon.com>
Reply-To: fredp1571@gmail.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2024 10:57:26 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="6a12f5494fe329ae11de877e3270d04b";
	logging-data="3033712"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18iI+NyNXLe0H7aZKKjPX/T"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:78.0)
 Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.0
Cancel-Lock: sha1:TAJjNXP57KnXhzleIDDTkeX4XWk=
In-Reply-To: <17bed5b715bf3f58$7434$1098985$c8d58268@news.newsdemon.com>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 4144

On 3/21/24 12:51 PM, moviePig wrote:
> On 3/21/2024 11:04 AM, FPP wrote:
>> On 3/20/24 10:42 PM, moviePig wrote:
>>> On 3/20/2024 7:54 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>> On Mar 20, 2024 at 3:15:33 PM PDT, ""Adam H. Kerman"" 
>>>> <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>>>>>> Mar 19, 2024 at 8:26:17 PM PDT, super70s 
>>>>>> <super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>>> On 2024-03-20 02:46:53 +0000, BTR1701 said:
>>>>>>>> What if the cops held the door open for them. Is that still 
>>>>>>>> unauthorized?
>>>>>
>>>>>>> Lie: The rioters were invited into the Capitol by police
>>>>>
>>>>>> There is clear video of the police holding the door open for 
>>>>>> people who were
>>>>>> later found guilty of unauthorized entry.
>>>>>
>>>>>> How does that logically hold up?
>>>>>
>>>>> With that evidence, why wasn't the charge of unauthorized entry
>>>>> withdrawn or dismissed? Seems to me that both the prosecution and 
>>>>> judge
>>>>> were obligated to do so.
>>>>
>>>> One would think. Obviously this only applies to a very small number 
>>>> of people
>>>> who were there that day but for those to whom it did apply, it seems 
>>>> that as a
>>>> matter of law one cannot be guilty of unauthorized entry if the 
>>>> people in
>>>> charge of authorizing you let you in.
>>>
>>> Indeed.  Not if one remains in the area he was let into.
>>
>>
>> Jesus, pig... you don't believe that shit do you?  Judges and juries 
>> sure didn't.
>>
>> https://www.cnn.com/2022/01/04/politics/fact-check-capitol-insurrection-january-6-lies/index.html 
>>
> 
> I believe pretty much that whole article, including the admission that a 
> couple of police might've allowed a couple of rioters in.  But what I 
> was addressing is the fact that allowing them into the building doesn't 
> equate to allowing them into Pelosi's office to shit on her desk.

Breaking in the windows with a battering ram, and smashing the doors 
down in kind of negates any "they allowed them in" argument.
Throwing aside cops and throwing barricades down is the same.

If you walked in a broken door or window, just a few feet away from 
where rioters were beating and brutalizing uniformed police officers, I 
don't see ANY argument to be made that you weren't aware that what you 
were doing was illegal.

-- 
"Thou shalt not make a machine in the likeness of a man’s mind." - OC 
Bible  25B.G.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/ek8kap93bmk0q5w/D%20U%20N%20E%20Part%20II.jpg?dl=0

Gracie, age 6.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/0es3xolxka455iw/BetterThingsToDo.jpg?dl=0