Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<utlirq$3dsl2$2@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: olcott <polcott2@gmail.com> Newsgroups: comp.theory Subject: Categorically exhaustive reasoning applied to the decision to abort Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2024 22:38:33 -0500 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 44 Message-ID: <utlirq$3dsl2$2@dont-email.me> References: <utlf69$39fl1$1@dont-email.me> <utlff5$3997r$3@dont-email.me> <utlgg1$2o1am$20@i2pn2.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2024 03:38:34 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="c59f7dfe69f4a5279bf8dd8742d31ecc"; logging-data="3601058"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19wNr6wYBlF0HEABMv5QwEz" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:sqJkGNdIxIOZwmCovElSIDt4lr8= In-Reply-To: <utlgg1$2o1am$20@i2pn2.org> Content-Language: en-US Bytes: 2568 On 3/22/2024 9:58 PM, Richard Damon wrote: > On 3/22/24 10:40 PM, olcott wrote: >> On 3/22/2024 9:35 PM, André G. Isaak wrote: >>> I note that during the past week there have been almost 1,000 >>> messages on this group, almost all relating to the various Olcott >>> threads which apparently never halt. >>> >>> Imagine how much you all might have accomplished this past week if >>> you weren't so invested in this. >>> >>> Just sayin’ >>> >>> André >>> >> >> Try and provide a valid rebuttal. I have acknowledged a serious >> mistake that I persistently made for many months. > > There HAS BEEN. MANY of them. > > You just ignore all of it, showing that YOUR statements are just your > own groundless babbling of LIES, proving that you know NOTHING of how > logic works. > *If that was true then you would not have agreed to this* *That you agreed with this proves that it not true* On 3/20/2024 6:02 PM, Richard Damon wrote: > On 3/20/24 6:01 PM, olcott wrote: >> Every H(D,D) that doesn't abort its simulated input >> never stops running. > > Yep, shows that H's that don't abort the D built on > them won't be deciders... I am using [Categorically exhaustive reasoning applied to the decision to abort] You and Mike don't seem to understand this. -- Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer