Path: ...!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject: Re: This FOSS Thang :-)
Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2024 05:10:08 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: the-candyden-of-code
Lines: 34
Message-ID: <utlo7g$3f2rm$6@dont-email.me>
References: <uso2en$184pn$1@solani.org>
 <ug4vui1sog06gsn7r2dep8t32pg539pnc9@4ax.com> <usq48p$dl57$1@dont-email.me>
 <17bc1de93bb4055f$981$3331982$802601b3@news.usenetexpress.com>
 <usr82n$19trd$4@solani.org> <ut4t4o$32464$1@dont-email.me>
 <65f600a1$0$8233$426a74cc@news.free.fr> <utcpgl$10gjc$1@dont-email.me>
 <uteb9m$1bjsl$2@dont-email.me> <dopmvihbiuf7p5u52lr02tjjf8b4pogbdn@4ax.com>
 <utk7j8$309po$1@dont-email.me> <utk8f7$30e7n$3@dont-email.me>
 <utkhn3$32kac$4@dont-email.me> <utl262$36lna$2@dont-email.me>
Injection-Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2024 05:10:08 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="16c3aaa2e0726ab4762a55bb3c63c328";
	logging-data="3640182"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+qgz+GOu+qOaWfGWWudVLE3n5/cbEHqMHIHDSSoEkKkA=="
User-Agent: slrn/pre1.0.4-9 (Linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:Mt1lltfFEA1FowixlsZ7QV79CE0=
X-Face: b{dPmN&%4|lEo,wUO\"KLEOu5N_br(N2Yuc5/qcR5i>9-!^e\.Tw9?/m0}/~:UOM:Zf]%
 b+ V4R8q|QiU/R8\|G\WpC`-s?=)\fbtNc&=/a3a)r7xbRI]Vl)r<%PTriJ3pGpl_/B6!8pe\btzx
 `~R! r3.0#lHRE+^Gro0[cjsban'vZ#j7,?I/tHk{s=TFJ:H?~=]`O*~3ZX`qik`b:.gVIc-[$t/e
 ZrQsWJ >|l^I_[pbsIqwoz.WGA]<D
Bytes: 3013

RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote at 22:53 this Friday (GMT):
> On 2024-03-22, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote:
>> RonB wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>>
>>> On 2024-03-22, candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> wrote:
>>>> chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote at 22:56 this Wednesday (GMT):
>>>>> vallor wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>BTW, what hh really wants in a Linux system is something
>>>>>>running ChromeOS.  You telling me he can't find a Chromebook?
>>>>>
>>>>> Obviously, a Chromebook is also far from optimal for most people,
>>>>> despite the "larger marketshare" that gives the "full time UI
>>>>> professionals" the "greatest amount of user UI feedback to optimize
>>>>> from".
>>>>>
>>>>> -highhorse's anti-choice idiocy continues to astonish me.
>>>>>
>>>>> You only have to look around you, to see that he's wrong.  Pick a
>>>>> market.  Any healthy, competitive market will do.
>>>>
>>>> Chromebooks are pretty bad, yeah.
>>>
>>> I tried out Chromebooks. I agree. You can run Linux on them, but working 
>>> around the ChromeOS is a pain.
>>
>> Nonsense!  School kids everywhere use them!  :-)
>
> I pity the kids.


Yeah, the school ones are especially bad, probably from buying in bulk.
-- 
user <candycane> is generated from /dev/urandom