Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid>
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
Subject: Re: OT: More Nails in the Global Warming Scam's Coffin
Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2024 16:14:12 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 27
Message-ID: <utnno6$3tpc8$1@dont-email.me>
References: <mh3svidvdm11rfcb87qm5l2bgssffpt7pq@4ax.com>
 <ln4uvihvhcftscn5gf7vmijnqhm3rt7rgs@4ax.com>
 <1qqw3sg.1xt0x6u1pf4tigN%liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid>
 <7thuvidj3d6df9uurcg5k02hvdf3q8im7n@4ax.com>
 <65ff5116$0$4189$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2024 23:14:15 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="0f15de27691b0dbca916e7b9c88c302b";
	logging-data="4121992"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+UTnbo6KkxMP+rJUNbUuq8"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.2.2
Cancel-Lock: sha1:biqRLWm7lLxjVs1l+9u7Tdb/PeM=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <65ff5116$0$4189$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
Bytes: 2638

On 3/23/2024 3:00 PM, bitrex wrote:
> Meanwhile, cranky wingnut "I don't believe in dat climate change stuff!" owners 
> of beachfront property (naturally!) want the state/taxpayer to pitch in to save 
> their property from the rising sea:
> 
> <https://www.instagram.com/krazykarens2020/reel/C4mb8m3LLO8/>
> 
> I expect they're going to take a heart-warming bath, alright. "Them dirty poors 
> are stealing our hard-earned money! Taxation is theft by the state! Ack here 
> comes the sea, come save us mommy state! Glub, glub, glub..."

I suspect even the farmers in the flyover states are starting to realize
that their primary asset (acreage) can't be relocated if the local climate
makes it "unproductive" ("Hey!  Let's put up a WINDFARM!!")

[Latest surveys continue to show increasing (US) belief in climate change...
the differences seem to be who/how to deal with it:  "MY assets should be
protected but why should *I* have to bear that cost?"]

Disney will be the Florida property to watch.  Far enough from the coast to
not be immediately threatened (and, able -- at some expense -- to move
their "attractions" elsewhere) yet likely keenly aware that the long
term play doesn't seem to be to remain in place...

Insurers (folks whose money is where their mouth is) have already made
that decision!