Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<utprtv$1p3a5$3@solani.org>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!news-out.netnews.com!news.alt.net!us1.netnews.com!sewer!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!reader5.news.weretis.net!news.solani.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject: Re: Why Python When There Is Perl?
Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2024 13:37:52 -0500
Message-ID: <utprtv$1p3a5$3@solani.org>
References: <17be420c4f90bfc7$63225$1585792$802601b3@news.usenetexpress.com>
 <utd86u$1ipcj$1@solani.org>
 <17be75acfaf8f0f4$2017$3384359$802601b3@news.usenetexpress.com>
 <utfol0$1k8j7$1@solani.org>
 <17bebbae334656b9$74345$2906873$802601b3@news.usenetexpress.com>
 <utiopt$2i4i5$1@dont-email.me>
 <17bf321f9c15028e$2$2218499$802601b3@news.usenetexpress.com>
 <utlbto$38pmm$1@dont-email.me> <utltt2$1n3m4$1@solani.org>
 <utniif$1o32m$2@solani.org> <utnjpc$3sqhf$3@dont-email.me>
 <utpm1q$1ovte$2@solani.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2024 18:37:51 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: solani.org;
	logging-data="1871173"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@news.solani.org"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:LMmgG37qYWqVLC4xihjBq0PJqGU=
Content-Language: en-US
X-Antivirus: Avast (VPS 240324-6, 3/24/2024), Outbound message
In-Reply-To: <utpm1q$1ovte$2@solani.org>
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
X-User-ID: eJwNx8EBwCAIA8CVQEnAcVBg/xHa+x02lc+NoGEwhqz+e63q+c3aU6KvIEc3A1x0gyTSWmmRcl649Jwb3bo+W7UVZA==
Bytes: 2588
Lines: 26

On 3/24/2024 11:57 AM, Physfitfreak wrote:
> On 3/23/2024 5:06 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
>> Aka “the law of the excluded middle”. Remember, we are working in an
>> algebra where variables only have two possible values. If you want to add
>> a third value, you end up with a different algebra.
> 
> 
> Then why would a programmer do that? AND and OR both single out a case 
> out of four possibilities, by looking for a case when both sides of the 
> operator match. But IMP seems to be an attempt to introduce and single 
> out a case where _only_ the left side be 1 and the right side be 0.
> 
> I don't understand what was the motive behind introducing this into 
> programming language. The same singling out is very easily arranged with 
> using an AND operator. "if (A = 1) AND (B = 0) then you get a False".
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

In other words, you don't have to generate a False to have a False. You 
can assign a False!

-- 
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
www.avast.com