Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: Riley Gaines advocates for women!
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2025 07:08:50 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 70
Message-ID: <utqmpj1vkacrpoar8iko05prcfijm2of1r@4ax.com>
References: <vn4irf$3fstj$1@dont-email.me> <vn704s$cj14$1@dont-email.me> <vn743p$i53s$1@dont-email.me> <vn8blk$11j61$1@dont-email.me> <vn8n2r$163m1$2@dont-email.me> <fgjhpjpu53omf39l71fv457p2tii4knqri@4ax.com> <vnb54a$1ubhl$2@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2025 13:08:51 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="293a1fea58f980c428c90a87d83ac784";
	logging-data="3090630"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18aJtjC34zObCHmBdUI34TaRYLWz8lNEE8="
Cancel-Lock: sha1:iPn9upA31HvFOrEWMgCNEUwWNcI=
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 3.3/32.846
X-Antivirus: Avast (VPS 250130-4, 1/30/2025), Outbound message
Bytes: 4181

On Tue, 28 Jan 2025 12:45:45 -0500, moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com>
wrote:

>On 1/28/2025 7:31 AM, NoBody wrote:
>> On Mon, 27 Jan 2025 19:33:47 -0000 (UTC), BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com>
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> On Jan 27, 2025 at 8:18:59 AM PST, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 1/27/2025 12:03 AM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>   On Jan 26, 2025 at 7:56:12 PM PST, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
>>>>>   
>>>>>>   On 1/26/2025 9:34 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>>     On Jan 26, 2025 at 3:53:51 PM PST, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>     
>>>>>>>>     On 1/26/2025 6:23 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>       On Jan 26, 2025 at 3:01:51 PM PST, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>       
>>>>>>>>>>       On 1/26/2025 1:55 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>         On Jan 25, 2025 at 9:57:03 PM PST, ""Adam H. Kerman"" <ahk@chinet.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>       wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>         
>>>>>>>>>>>>         Riley Gaines slams Democrats. Republicans take the moral high ground.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>         https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kItskvsbizI
>>>>>>>>>>>         
>>>>>>>>>>>         Love Riley. She speaks facts.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>       What law forces a declaration of gender at birth?
>>>>>>>>>       
>>>>>>>>>       I'm not sure what video you watched, but this one was about a law
>>>>>>>>> stopping
>>>>>>>>>       grown men from sexually assaulting female athletes by exposing
>>>>>>>>>   themselves in
>>>>>>>>>       women's private restrooms and changing rooms, and keeping men from
>>>>>>>>> taking
>>>>>>>>>       trophies, scholarships, and other benefits in sports by pretending to be
>>>>>>>>>       women.
>>>>>>>>>       
>>>>>>>>>       This is not a law about forcing declarations of gender at birth.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>     Maybe I misunderstood.  I thought the issue came down to who's male and
>>>>>>>>     who's female, with the debatable certainty of one or the other.
>>>>>>>     
>>>>>>>     If you're a female athlete and there's a penis wagging in your face in the
>>>>>>>     women's locker room, it's pretty certain what the problem is there.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>   I'm not sure it *is* all that certain.
>>>>>   
>>>>>   Of course you're not. What's brutally obvious to normal people continually
>>>>>   eludes you.
>>>>>   
>>>>>>      E.g., *any* uninvited crotch in
>>>>>>   *anyone's* face is problematic.  Regardless, I think the particular
>>>>>>   social mores you want enforced would need you to define, in unambiguous
>>>>>>   legalese, who's male and who's female.  Imo, that won't be trivial.
>>>>
>>>> Rather than resort to ad hominem, why not state the "brutally obvious"?
>>>
>>> The man had his penis exposed in a women's locker room.
>>>
>> 
>> Goodness how WILL we tell the difference?
>> Laughter.
>
>The difference between what?
>

The difference between women and men pretending to be women.