Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<utsir7$196ac$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!npeer.as286.net!npeer-ng0.as286.net!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: super70s <super70s@super70s.invalid> Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv Subject: Re: Repeating my comments on killfiling crossposted political threads Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2024 14:21:11 -0500 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 70 Message-ID: <utsir7$196ac$1@dont-email.me> References: <utpp2a$ge4f$1@dont-email.me> <utr7us$uk7h$1@dont-email.me> <uts84r$16aj1$2@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2024 20:21:13 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="ca8131bf0d7fc7608f6499ce89aec2d2"; logging-data="1349964"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18EAso5vOzIbUKnOKkWsI2E4knP6eN3RkI=" User-Agent: Unison/2.2 Cancel-Lock: sha1:/Pqu8O8rmnVufHJ05gQPq3iBJX8= Bytes: 4397 On 2024-03-25 16:18:35 +0000, Adam H. Kerman said: > super70s <super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote: >> On 2024-03-24 17:48:58 +0000, Adam H. Kerman said: > >>> For those of you who remember the good old days, rec.arts.tv was largely >>> free of political articles crossposted from other newsgroups till the >>> antics of a certain resentful actor who didn't have much of a career in >>> regional theater and used to post via his WebTV device started dragging >>> them in. Then Ubi the shithead and a few others began dragging in the >>> political crosspost threads. Pretty soon, some of those who regularly >>> crossposted political articles began adding rec.arts.tv to the crosspost >>> as this remained an active newsgroup. > >>> I've tried various tactics in my own newsreader to avoid crossposted >>> threads. I was killfiling based on newsgroups in the crosspost, but I've >>> switched to entering newsgroups whose articles I don't want to read >>> first to junk them, then reading rec.arts.tv. Junking an article (your >>> newsreader may call it something else) marks the article as read in the >>> newsgroup being read plus any newsgroup it's crossposted into. > >>> This is how I de-yadified rec.arts.tv by killfiling in that newsgroup >>> and then junking the rest, and then reading rec.arts.tv. > >>> Several of you are posting followups in these crossposted political >>> threads. If you don't cut the crosspost entirely and just leave >>> rec.arts.tv as the sole newsgroup on the Newsgroups header, I've >>> killfiled your followups. > >>> Just sayin'. > >>> If you want me to read your followup, then don't crosspost. > >>> Because of the political crossposting, rec.arts.tv has a bad reputation >>> among the rest of Usenet. There are people who simply refuse to read it >>> due to the political crossposting. It's entirely possible that if I >>> hadn't already been a regular long before this crap started, I might >>> have been unwilling to participate here. > >>> I hate the crossposters. I think they aren't encouraging conversation >>> but ruining every newsgroup they touch. Properly, individual newsgroups >>> develop their own personalities and crossposting for that reason has >>> always been harmful to our social culture, such as it is. > >>> In followup, watch for the crosspost, and watch for antics by people >>> like Ubi the shithead and others who attempt to redirect your followup >>> elsewhere with the use of Followup-To. > >>> I would encourage you not to crosspost in followup but that's your >>> decision, not mine. > >> BTR1701 originates his "conservative red meat item" in here (and in >> here only) daily, does that count as one of your "political threads"? > > I said "crosspost" and its derivative words 17 times throughout the > article. How did you manage to miss it? No I didn't "miss it" at all. > BTR1701 may start a political thread but he doesn't crosspost. I thought you were complaining about the prevalence of political threads in r.a.t. What the hell difference does it make whether they're crossposted or not. > If you post a followup in a crossposted political thread without cutting > the crosspost, I won't read it. Do you understand? Heavens to Murgatroyd, can we survive?