Path: ...!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: Organized Gangs of Illegals Prowl Countryside for Homes to Steal
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2024 19:57:42 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 36
Message-ID: <utskvm$198ng$5@dont-email.me>
References: <U_OcnQf53vPoWZz7nZ2dnZfqn_EAAAAA@giganews.com> <17c018132dbf837d$2090$3384359$c2d58868@news.newsdemon.com> <Z7adnT-SdedwTpz7nZ2dnZfqn_ednZ2d@giganews.com>
Injection-Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2024 20:57:42 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="7a3878519db7e9df79d6478859939a1d";
	logging-data="1352432"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/cKYIpAdCJJSqsOSHiBDVVzWE7kP7oYWo="
Cancel-Lock: sha1:SjHWDSx4VlbLZREppuVPzDddFRw=
X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test77 (Sep 1, 2010)
Bytes: 2966

BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>On Mar 25, 2024 at 12:18:48 PM PDT, "moviePig" <never@nothere.com> wrote:
>>On 3/25/2024 2:37 PM, BTR1701 wrote:

>>>Thanks to Biden's open borders policy and 'progressive' laws that favor
>>>criminals over citizens, we now have organized gangs of illegals who prowl
>>>the countryside looking for homes to steal.

>>>https://twitter.com/libsoftiktok/status/1770495590075650279?s=46
 
>>Well, that does set me wondering to what extent you must upkeep your 
>>residential property...

>It's not a question of upkeep. These are homes that are kept up just fine.
>They're just not occupied at the time the illegals come along, break in, and
>say they're now living there. And the police, constrained by these
>'progressive' laws that literally cite "squatters' rights", can do nothing
>except arrest the homeowner for trying to kick the illegals out.

>Remember, these "squatters" are people who aren't even legally allowed to be
>in the country, let alone the home in question, and who do the leftist
>government officials favor? The criminal illegal alien over the law-abiding
>American citizen who's having their home stolen from them.

Neither are they "squatters" for the properties in question were never
abandoned. In your New York example, the criminal falsely told the
police he was a tenant. The police did not believe it. Strange, though,
that they failed to arrest him for making a false statement to the
police in a criminal investigation. Isn't that obstruction of justice?

I understand that eviction is a civil matter and that only a sheriff may
perform that duty to enforce a judgement. But here we have all sorts of
crimes overlooked, illegal entry (if not breaking and entry) and
criminal trespass and lying to police. If there's any damage, then
vandalism. Police can certainly make an arrest without literally
carrying out the eviction.