Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!reader5.news.weretis.net!news.solani.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject: Re: Why Python When There Is Perl?
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2024 22:36:50 -0500
Message-ID: <uttfsj$1qt9g$1@solani.org>
References: <17be420c4f90bfc7$63225$1585792$802601b3@news.usenetexpress.com>
 <utd86u$1ipcj$1@solani.org>
 <17be75acfaf8f0f4$2017$3384359$802601b3@news.usenetexpress.com>
 <utfol0$1k8j7$1@solani.org>
 <17bebbae334656b9$74345$2906873$802601b3@news.usenetexpress.com>
 <utiopt$2i4i5$1@dont-email.me>
 <17bf321f9c15028e$2$2218499$802601b3@news.usenetexpress.com>
 <utlbto$38pmm$1@dont-email.me>
 <17bf5ce92e8c43b4$672$1351842$802601b3@news.usenetexpress.com>
 <utnk1l$1o32m$3@solani.org>
 <17bf8777050f5c1e$7$2218499$802601b3@news.usenetexpress.com>
 <uto07e$1oa9p$1@solani.org> <utss89$1qiu6$2@solani.org>
 <l6egbaFl42cU1@mid.individual.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2024 03:36:51 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: solani.org;
	logging-data="1930544"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@news.solani.org"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:kOtMY7THRWDgYgcWl+biiCVYtvM=
X-Antivirus: Avast (VPS 240325-8, 3/25/2024), Outbound message
In-Reply-To: <l6egbaFl42cU1@mid.individual.net>
Content-Language: en-US
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
X-User-ID: eJwFwQEBACAIA7BKqPyeOKDSP4IbFgfPdoKORsusyYo8lnqnayTC/XUmZ8DuVT3tKxTGnojVlBjW602VfWQHFXo=
Bytes: 2630
Lines: 27

On 3/25/2024 6:40 PM, rbowman wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Mar 2024 17:01:46 -0500, Physfitfreak wrote:
> 
>> In this topic that we were discussing, I hadn't even paid close
>> attention to the word "implication". Now that I'm looking more
>> carefully, I see that it is better than "concurrence" for use in that
>> type of operation.
> 
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Material_conditional
> 
> Prolog uses :- for Horn clauses, which are evaluated from right to left. I
> dug out my Prolog manual from 1982 and it launched into a discussion of
> Horn clauses and remarked Prolog wasn't ready for propositional calculus.
> Maybe someday.
> 
> Still a strange thing to be found in the Beginner's All-purpose Symbolic
> Instruction Code.  I doubt there were many mourners when it was dropped.
> 
> 


https://qb64phoenix.com/qb64wiki/index.php/IMP

On the rightmost column in the table.

-- 
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
www.avast.com