Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<utua5t$1p4c6$2@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: Ketanji Jackson Worried That the 1st Amendment is Hamstringing
 Government Censorship
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2024 07:05:33 -0400
Organization: Ph'nglui Mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh Wgah'nagl Fhtagn.
Lines: 72
Message-ID: <utua5t$1p4c6$2@dont-email.me>
References: <AbGcneZpLeuJ12f4nZ2dnZfqn_idnZ2d@giganews.com>
 <utjpbj$2srhl$1@dont-email.me>
 <Crmcnc_SKN28dWD4nZ2dnZfqn_YAAAAA@giganews.com>
 <17bf31450798f61c$1$1100308$44d50e60@news.newsdemon.com>
 <Y26dnWI6_a92bGD4nZ2dnZfqn_adnZ2d@giganews.com>
 <utmrou$3n3jl$3@dont-email.me>
 <atropos-DA20D8.10523923032024@news.giganews.com>
Reply-To: fredp1571@gmail.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2024 12:05:33 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="face2f04f79da53c25a7c96d8c9608aa";
	logging-data="1872262"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/p7YYCFnSpRN7cKniS6qDx"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:78.0)
 Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.0
Cancel-Lock: sha1:OFolFBc3VnsUNbkCMfwVZTFyZgQ=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <atropos-DA20D8.10523923032024@news.giganews.com>
Bytes: 4430

On 3/23/24 1:52 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> In article <utmrou$3n3jl$3@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> 
>> On 3/22/24 5:02 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>> On Mar 22, 2024 at 1:49:13 PM PDT, "moviePig" <never@nothere.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 3/22/2024 4:20 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>    On Mar 22, 2024 at 4:17:05 AM PDT, "FPP" <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>    
>>>>>>    On 3/21/24 7:17 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>>      In article
>>>>>>>      <17bee95657459db9$30487$1351842$40d50a60@news.newsdemon.com>,
>>>>>>>        moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
> 
>>>>>>>> Seems you're now arguing for freedom of the press, as if anyone in
>>>>>>>> this dialogue has ever disputed it.
>>>>>>>      
>>>>>>> Effa disputed it: "Or try publishing National Defense secrets..."
>>>>>>>      
>>>>>>>> Not many Usenet points for that...
>>>>>>>      
>>>>>>> Points restored.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanny isn't a journalist.
>>>>>    
>>>>> Don't need to be. I'm still protected under the 1st Amendment. Nowhere
>>>>> does the 1st Amendment limit press protection to only people who work for
>>>>> big legacy corporations. Indeed, the Supreme Court has ruled that citizen
>>>>> media-- bloggers, YouTubers, individual citizens commenting on websites--
>>>>> all fall under the 1st Amendment's press protections.
>>>>>    
>>>>>> The Espionage Act
>>>>>> National defense information in general is protected by the Espionage
>>>>>> Act,21 18 U.S.C. зз 793н 798
>>>>>    
>>>>> New York Times Co. v. United States, 403 U.S. 713 (1971)
>>>>>    
>>>>> Any elements of the Act that conflict with the Supreme Court's decision
>>>>> in NY Times v U.S. are superseded by it.
>>>>>    
>>>>> That's how this shit works. You know, the Supreme Court decides whether
>>>>> statutes or parts of statutes are constitutional or not. This is
>>>>> something grade schoolers know but our resident amateur historian
>>>>> apparently needs explained to him.
>>>>
>>>> So, you maintain that, if the Times were to obtain (somehow) and publish
>>>> a top-secret map of all U.S. nuclear silos -- say, in the name of
>>>> "neighborhood awareness" -- there'd be no reprisal?
>>>
>>> There'd be plenty of reprisal in court of public opinion, but any official
>>> government sanction would be illegal.
> 
>> Bullshit.
> 
> New York Times v. United States, 403 U.S. 713 (1971)
> 
> (Note: I'm the one who consistently produces cites in this thread to
> back up what I say. Effa is the one who lies and says I don't have cites
> and then makes ridiculous claims with no cites to back up what *he*
> says.)
> 

You are not the NY Times.  Bullshit.

-- 
"Thou shalt not make a machine in the likeness of a man’s mind." - OC 
Bible  25B.G.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/ek8kap93bmk0q5w/D%20U%20N%20E%20Part%20II.jpg?dl=0

Gracie, age 6.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/0es3xolxka455iw/BetterThingsToDo.jpg?dl=0