Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: NBC Historian Takes Media's "Bloodbath" Insanity To A Whole New
 Level
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2024 07:16:28 -0400
Organization: Ph'nglui Mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh Wgah'nagl Fhtagn.
Lines: 85
Message-ID: <utuaqc$1p9hm$2@dont-email.me>
References: <utbtok$pkre$10@dont-email.me>
 <p6mcnRxmu82A02f4nZ2dnZfqnPidnZ2d@giganews.com>
 <utdl0p$19mot$1@dont-email.me>
 <6NydnWwGgNc0xWf4nZ2dnZfqn_udnZ2d@giganews.com>
 <utfn65$1nrjb$1@dont-email.me>
 <J_SdnRPRtZzf6mb4nZ2dnZfqnPWdnZ2d@giganews.com>
 <17bea7625eadf0f8$300665$2218499$46d50c60@news.newsdemon.com>
 <uthi9p$29328$6@dont-email.me>
 <17bed5b715bf3f58$7434$1098985$c8d58268@news.newsdemon.com>
 <utjo6m$2sijg$1@dont-email.me> <j8ptvit6f596j0kaj3evg1iiou4r0l8t22@4ax.com>
 <17bf6efe87d228ca$37$3121036$c0d58a68@news.newsdemon.com>
Reply-To: fredp1571@gmail.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2024 12:16:29 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="96363b11e8e1e48c8d7dc65de4d0357a";
	logging-data="1877558"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18IVtvEE1+b5JEtxzFK5Anz"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:78.0)
 Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.0
Cancel-Lock: sha1:ojrCNWIR5NHrOtga5TLDg8plR9o=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <17bf6efe87d228ca$37$3121036$c0d58a68@news.newsdemon.com>
Bytes: 5114

On 3/23/24 11:40 AM, moviePig wrote:
> On 3/23/2024 10:22 AM, NoBody wrote:
>> On Fri, 22 Mar 2024 06:57:24 -0400, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 3/21/24 12:51 PM, moviePig wrote:
>>>> On 3/21/2024 11:04 AM, FPP wrote:
>>>>> On 3/20/24 10:42 PM, moviePig wrote:
>>>>>> On 3/20/2024 7:54 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>> On Mar 20, 2024 at 3:15:33 PM PDT, ""Adam H. Kerman""
>>>>>>> <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Mar 19, 2024 at 8:26:17 PM PDT, super70s
>>>>>>>>> <super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 2024-03-20 02:46:53 +0000, BTR1701 said:
>>>>>>>>>>> What if the cops held the door open for them. Is that still
>>>>>>>>>>> unauthorized?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Lie: The rioters were invited into the Capitol by police
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> There is clear video of the police holding the door open for
>>>>>>>>> people who were
>>>>>>>>> later found guilty of unauthorized entry.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> How does that logically hold up?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> With that evidence, why wasn't the charge of unauthorized entry
>>>>>>>> withdrawn or dismissed? Seems to me that both the prosecution and
>>>>>>>> judge
>>>>>>>> were obligated to do so.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> One would think. Obviously this only applies to a very small number
>>>>>>> of people
>>>>>>> who were there that day but for those to whom it did apply, it seems
>>>>>>> that as a
>>>>>>> matter of law one cannot be guilty of unauthorized entry if the
>>>>>>> people in
>>>>>>> charge of authorizing you let you in.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Indeed.  Not if one remains in the area he was let into.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Jesus, pig... you don't believe that shit do you?  Judges and juries
>>>>> sure didn't.
>>>>>
>>>>> https://www.cnn.com/2022/01/04/politics/fact-check-capitol-insurrection-january-6-lies/index.html 
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I believe pretty much that whole article, including the admission 
>>>> that a
>>>> couple of police might've allowed a couple of rioters in.  But what I
>>>> was addressing is the fact that allowing them into the building doesn't
>>>> equate to allowing them into Pelosi's office to shit on her desk.
>>>
>>> Breaking in the windows with a battering ram, and smashing the doors
>>> down in kind of negates any "they allowed them in" argument.
>>> Throwing aside cops and throwing barricades down is the same.
>>>
>>> If you walked in a broken door or window, just a few feet away from
>>> where rioters were beating and brutalizing uniformed police officers, I
>>> don't see ANY argument to be made that you weren't aware that what you
>>> were doing was illegal.
>>
>> So you agree that the BLM "protests" were an insurrection.  Good to
>> know.  Now if I could only find your posts decrying those events and
>> demanding arrests.
>>
>> I *know* they must be out there somewhere.  Perhaps you could find and
>> repost a few of them for us?
> 
> Did you look under "Attempts To Undo A Presidential Election"?...
> 
> 

Protests against systematic murder of blacks by the State are different 
from trying to overthrow a government by force and violence.

-- 
"Thou shalt not make a machine in the likeness of a man’s mind." - OC 
Bible  25B.G.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/ek8kap93bmk0q5w/D%20U%20N%20E%20Part%20II.jpg?dl=0

Gracie, age 6.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/0es3xolxka455iw/BetterThingsToDo.jpg?dl=0