Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<utv3gs$29bt6$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: Organized Gangs of Illegals Prowl Countryside for Homes to Steal
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2024 18:18:05 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 43
Message-ID: <utv3gs$29bt6$1@dont-email.me>
References: <U_OcnQf53vPoWZz7nZ2dnZfqn_EAAAAA@giganews.com> <atropos-1546B3.09065326032024@news.giganews.com> <utus17$1t4ak$4@dont-email.me> <95v50j968ssk1ke50k7pfkvbila40rh6fv@4ax.com>
Injection-Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2024 18:18:05 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="3a1dca0f6cfcb209f610255b8ebeab74";
	logging-data="2404262"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19FqFO9FPWAveoTgbI8iy5G9Frv7S4evmk="
Cancel-Lock: sha1://UFiTnjc5ChBcecaGn2AP+uusU=
X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test77 (Sep 1, 2010)
Bytes: 2961

shawn <nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com> wrote:
>Tue, 26 Mar 2024 16:10:16 -0000 (UTC), Adam H. Kerman <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
>>BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>>>Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
>>>>ahk@chinet.com wrote:

>>>>>>. . . 

>>>>>Neither are they "squatters" for the properties in question were never
>>>>>abandoned. In your New York example, the criminal falsely told the
>>>>>police he was a tenant. The police did not believe it. Strange, though,
>>>>>that they failed to arrest him for making a false statement to the
>>>>>police in a criminal investigation. Isn't that obstruction of justice?

>>>>As I understand it, the squatter claiming to be a renter means it's no
>>>>longer a police matter.

>>>The police matter would be them responding to the fuckers I shot when I 
>>>came home and found them in my house.

>>Let's ignore shooting anybody.

>>I don't see why the police can't make an arrest of the criminals. The
>>rightful occupant calls the police, demonstrates evidence of occupancy
>>like a key to the lock, showing identification, mail with his own name
>>on it, utility bills, possibly even finding his own lease. Maybe there
>>is damage to a door or window.

>>The criminal claiming to be the rightful tenant has lied. He can be
>>charged with a crime for lying, for the breaking and entering, and for
>>criminal trespass.

>>Make the arrest. It is indeed a criminal matter.

>That would be true in almost any other state. My only guess is the
>police have become so unsure of any action being taken against
>criminals now that if there is any doubt about the outcome they are
>hesitant to go through the motions. Hard to otherwise explain why they
>wouldn't take the obvious illegal occupants of the home into custody.

To the extant that police refuse to protect and defend honest
law-abiding taxpayers, I say "Defend the police." We don't need police
who won't arrest criminals.