Warning: mysqli::__construct(): (HY000/1203): User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\includes\artfuncs.php on line 21
Failed to connect to MySQL: (1203) User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections
Warning: mysqli::query(): Couldn't fetch mysqli in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\index.php on line 66
Article <utvmsf$82hi$2@news.mixmin.net>
Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<utvmsf$82hi$2@news.mixmin.net>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Anonymous <anon@anon.net>
Newsgroups: misc.phone.mobile.iphone
Subject: Re: Justice Department files antitrust suit against Apple
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2024 19:48:31 -0400
Organization: Mixmin
Message-ID: <utvmsf$82hi$2@news.mixmin.net>
References: <xn0ojl66a1q9nyc005@reader443.eternal-september.org>
 <CpWdnX1RvOSC-2P4nZ2dnZfqnPWdnZ2d@supernews.com>
 <utlovo$3f8ji$1@dont-email.me> <utmgfo$3kegg$1@dont-email.me>
 <-bCcnWvtgscvkWL4nZ2dnZfqn_idnZ2d@supernews.com>
 <utr6hs$3r204$1@news.mixmin.net> <_yiMN.122726$SyNd.9398@fx33.iad>
 <utt7kt$1ejr$1@news.mixmin.net> <2bBMN.104112$_a1e.62699@fx16.iad>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2024 23:48:32 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: news.mixmin.net; posting-host="c4af4a3027e8317d29ea238d8aa6bb2f616aa3fc";
	logging-data="264754"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@mixmin.net"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <2bBMN.104112$_a1e.62699@fx16.iad>
Bytes: 4341
Lines: 67

Alan Browne wrote:
> On 2024-03-25 21:16, Anonymous wrote:
>> Alan Browne wrote:
>>> On 2024-03-25 02:45, Anonymous wrote:
>>>> Tyrone wrote:
>>>
>>>>> You keep saying that, but it makes no sense. And AGAIN, what laws is Apple not
>>>>> abiding? Because YOU don't like Apple does not mean they are breaking any
>>>>> laws.
>>>>>
>>>>> Apple is a consumer products company.  They are selling directly to consumers.
>>>>>   How do you sell consumer products to consumers (who line up to buy your
>>>>> products, BTW) AND be "anti-consumer" at the same time?
>>>>>
>>>>> If Apple truly WAS "anti-consumer", then NO ONE WOULD BUY THE PRODUCTS. Do you
>>>>> understand simple logic?
>>>>>
>>>>> This DOJ case is all based on competitors whining that it is too difficult for
>>>>> them to make money selling software/whatever to Apple's customers. Well boo
>>>>> hoo. Apple is like 25% of the global market for phones and PCs. Try selling
>>>>> your stuff to the 75% of the market.
>>>>>
>>>>> Or feel free to create your own phones/tablets/desktops/ecosystem and make
>>>>> your money from your own products. Not just leeching from other company's
>>>>> products.
>>>>>
>>>>> U.S. anti-trust laws exist to protect consumers.  Not competitors.
>>>>
>>>> I'm not a lawyer, but the government can claim that Apple is engaging
>>>> in conspiracy to restrain trade and commerce, which is broadly illegal
>>>
>>> Apple has plenty of competition.
>>
>> According to the law, that doesn't matter as far as conspiracy is concerned.
>>
>>>> and does not require Apple to actually be a monopoly. And forget suing;
>>>> Tim Cook himself can be arrested and tried criminally for this if the [AAA] 
>>>> <---
>>>> government ever decided to actually enforce the law.
>>>
>>> ROFL.  At least you got the "I'm not a lawyer" part right.
>>
>> 15 U.S. Code § 1:
>>
>> "Every contract, combination in the form of trust or otherwise, or
>> conspiracy, in restraint of trade or commerce among the several States, or
>> with foreign nations, is declared to be illegal. Every person who shall make
>> any contract or engage in any combination or conspiracy hereby declared to
>> be illegal shall be deemed guilty of a felony, and, on conviction thereof,
>> shall be punished by fine not exceeding $100,000,000 if a corporation, or,
>> if any other person, $1,000,000, or by imprisonment not exceeding 10 years,
>> or by both said punishments, in the discretion of the court."
>>
>> https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/15/1
> 
> That "if a corporation" part sailed right over your head ... [AAA] above
> 
> Sheesh.  Don't state what you don't understand, and certainly don't quote what 
> you understand even less.

You can't throw a corporation in prison, genius.

"Every PERSON who shall make any contract or engage in any combination
or conspiracy hereby declared to be illegal shall be deemed guilty of a
felony, and, on conviction thereof, shall be punished by fine not exceeding
$100,000,000 if a corporation, OR, if any other PERSON, $1,000,000, or by 
imprisonment not exceeding 10 years, or by both said punishments, in the 
discretion of the court."