Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<uu01fb$2joas$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design Subject: Re: OT: Natural recycling at the origin of life Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2024 13:49:07 +1100 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 44 Message-ID: <uu01fb$2joas$1@dont-email.me> References: <utti1g$1r4o7$2@solani.org> <hdr50jlaa3g5887d3l4m75pk8kac3uu4rn@4ax.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2024 02:49:16 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="11527b80b927aa174e12693c163a35a5"; logging-data="2744668"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18x5z/Cv6CJICakoUQL9C4k8ZGaL3yHuLA=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:5qX6ughUHA/d1yCvGfaK+nmLgOw= In-Reply-To: <hdr50jlaa3g5887d3l4m75pk8kac3uu4rn@4ax.com> Content-Language: en-US Bytes: 2632 On 27/03/2024 2:50 am, John Larkin wrote: > On Tue, 26 Mar 2024 04:13:35 GMT, Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> > wrote: > >> Natural recycling at the origin of life >> https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2024/03/240322145524.htm >> Source: >> Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München >> Summary: >> How was complex life able to develop on the inhospitable early Earth? >> At the beginning there must have been ribonucleic acid (RNA) to carry the first genetic information. > > That's the hand-waving theory. Nobody has figured how that could have > happened, even in a hospitable environment. > >> To build up complexity in their sequences, these biomolecules need to release water. >> On the early Earth, which was largely covered in seawater, that was not so easy to do. >> >> So, simple :-) >> >> Then us, then chips, AI, what's next? > > What we need is a test to find the most dangerous people, thieves and > jihadists and Putins, and a genetic modification therapy to make them > safe. Since we don't yet know what makes them dangerous, we don't know if a genetic modification could make them safe. Robert Plombin's "Blueprint" https://mitpress.mit.edu/9780262039161/blueprint/ suggests that most complex human behavior is influenced by thousands of single nuclear polymorphisms, and each dangerous individual would require a whole raft of individually tailored genetic modifications. > It could even be a pandemic virus. Only in John Larkin's over-simplified universe. -- Bill Sloman, Sydney