Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<uu01fb$2joas$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org>
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
Subject: Re: OT: Natural recycling at the origin of life
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2024 13:49:07 +1100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 44
Message-ID: <uu01fb$2joas$1@dont-email.me>
References: <utti1g$1r4o7$2@solani.org>
 <hdr50jlaa3g5887d3l4m75pk8kac3uu4rn@4ax.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2024 02:49:16 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="11527b80b927aa174e12693c163a35a5";
	logging-data="2744668"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18x5z/Cv6CJICakoUQL9C4k8ZGaL3yHuLA="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:5qX6ughUHA/d1yCvGfaK+nmLgOw=
In-Reply-To: <hdr50jlaa3g5887d3l4m75pk8kac3uu4rn@4ax.com>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 2632

On 27/03/2024 2:50 am, John Larkin wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Mar 2024 04:13:35 GMT, Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid>
> wrote:
> 
>> Natural recycling at the origin of life
>> https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2024/03/240322145524.htm
>> Source:
>> Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
>> Summary:
>> How was complex life able to develop on the inhospitable early Earth?
>> At the beginning there must have been ribonucleic acid (RNA) to carry the first genetic information.
> 
> That's the hand-waving theory. Nobody has figured how that could have
> happened, even in a hospitable environment.
> 
>> To build up complexity in their sequences, these biomolecules need to release water.
>> On the early Earth, which was largely covered in seawater, that was not so easy to do.
>>
>> So, simple :-)
>>
>> Then us, then chips, AI, what's next?
> 
> What we need is a test to find the most dangerous people, thieves and
> jihadists and Putins, and a genetic modification therapy to make them
> safe.

Since we don't yet know what makes them dangerous, we don't know if a 
genetic modification could make them safe.

Robert Plombin's "Blueprint"

https://mitpress.mit.edu/9780262039161/blueprint/

suggests that most complex human behavior is influenced by thousands of 
single nuclear polymorphisms, and each dangerous individual would 
require a whole raft of individually tailored genetic modifications.

> It could even be a pandemic virus.

Only in John Larkin's over-simplified universe.

-- 
Bill Sloman, Sydney