Warning: mysqli::__construct(): (HY000/1203): User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\includes\artfuncs.php on line 21
Failed to connect to MySQL: (1203) User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections
Warning: mysqli::query(): Couldn't fetch mysqli in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\index.php on line 66
Article <uu1h3k$12v4q$2@dont-email.me>
Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<uu1h3k$12v4q$2@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Stephen Fuld <sfuld@alumni.cmu.edu.invalid>
Newsgroups: comp.arch
Subject: Re: Another security vulnerability
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2024 09:22:12 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 23
Message-ID: <uu1h3k$12v4q$2@dont-email.me>
References: <utpoi2$b6to$1@dont-email.me> <utq715$jsuq$3@dont-email.me>
 <utsa0k$12v4q$1@dont-email.me> <utspur$1akpd$4@dont-email.me>
 <80e708682d016d9c2a36adffa668f58e@www.novabbs.org>
 <utt4pm$1d406$2@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2024 17:22:15 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="8ff8833736304ccba397a3605627ddcb";
	logging-data="1146010"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+kTNbVulpHweG5adc6dhtR4ZxyrY3RMk4="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:ITAXUso0QcK4Vr5bT0/PW+mkFSg=
In-Reply-To: <utt4pm$1d406$2@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 1903

On 3/25/2024 5:27 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Mar 2024 22:17:55 +0000, MitchAlsup1 wrote:
> 
>> Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
>>
>>> The basic problem is that building all this complex, bug-prone
>>> functionality into monolithic, nonupgradeable hardware is not really a
>>> good idea.
>>
>> Would you like to inform us of how it can be done otherwise ?
> 
> Upgradeable firmware/software, of course.

But microcode is generally slower than dedicated hardware, and most 
people seem to be unwilling to give up performance all the time to gain 
an advantage in a situation that occurs infrequently and mostly never.



-- 
  - Stephen Fuld
(e-mail address disguised to prevent spam)