Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<uu3t52$3k5q1$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Oscar Mayer <nobody@oscarmayer.com> Newsgroups: misc.phone.mobile.iphone Subject: Re: Apple inflated the cost of its products through anticompetitive conduct Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2024 10:00:02 -0400 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 26 Message-ID: <uu3t52$3k5q1$1@dont-email.me> References: <uttqcd$1d8k$1@news.gegeweb.eu> <uu0fup$2mn6s$1@dont-email.me> <uu190f$2slqe$1@dont-email.me> <uu27uj$347g6$1@dont-email.me> <uu29da$34k07$1@dont-email.me> <LLdNN.123450$U1cc.34449@fx04.iad> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2024 14:00:05 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="e7a57ce25270a18396cc6f3fc2c70ebd"; logging-data="3807041"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX199HKTQUXqVqjiREkeYJkiJ" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.10.0 Cancel-Lock: sha1:E75115qrddPkzEEIE+tcKMLFuG0= Content-Language: en-US Bytes: 2347 On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 08:54:03 -0400, Alan Browne wrote: >> "How dare a company make unique products and services! HANG THEM!!!" >> >> That nutter > > Turning someone's sarcasm into something else is ... desperate? Maybe I misunderstood the poster who was making that sarcastic comment? It appeared to me that the poster was trying to claim Apple makes unique products, but if you say it was sarcasm, then I agree with him & with you. An app store isn't unique - it's a commodity. A messaging app isn't unique - it's a commodity. If it was sarcasm, then the person who made that statement agrees with me that Apple does not make those products unique simply by preventing integration and competition as a messaging app and an app store are commodities, which the DOJ argues Apple lies about why they control it. It's up to the judge to decide if the DOJ is correct that Apple is lying about why Apple severely controls these commodities versus if Apple is telling the truth that they prevent integration to "protect" the consumer. Thank you for explaining that the poster didn't mean what he had said.