Path: ...!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott2@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory,sci.logic
Subject: Re: Can any pathological input thwart a simulating abort decider?
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2024 10:24:43 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 126
Message-ID: <uu423r$3ldlj$1@dont-email.me>
References: <utkjd0$335kr$1@dont-email.me> <utmuq0$3ncb0$5@dont-email.me>
 <utn05t$3o86u$2@dont-email.me> <utn1ed$3od3s$2@dont-email.me>
 <utn8mb$3q1mb$2@dont-email.me> <utnadr$3ql3o$2@dont-email.me>
 <utnkh0$3t2rs$2@dont-email.me> <utsehd$17q02$3@dont-email.me>
 <utt28e$32apk$8@i2pn2.org> <utt4fk$1d2ks$1@dont-email.me>
 <utt50h$32apl$4@i2pn2.org> <utt5ot$1dbci$1@dont-email.me>
 <utt6de$32apl$5@i2pn2.org> <utt8c1$1dv6f$1@dont-email.me>
 <uttafr$32apl$7@i2pn2.org> <uttbbb$1eg0e$1@dont-email.me>
 <uttcq9$32apk$13@i2pn2.org> <uttdjg$1evla$1@dont-email.me>
 <utte3r$32apk$16@i2pn2.org> <uttfon$1j1tv$2@dont-email.me>
 <utuc5f$33t23$1@i2pn2.org> <utuome$1sn8a$1@dont-email.me>
 <utvvkt$35q21$5@i2pn2.org> <uu04sc$2jvdi$3@dont-email.me>
 <uu2ep3$374vo$5@i2pn2.org> <uu2ikh$36cl6$3@dont-email.me>
 <uu2k6i$374vo$13@i2pn2.org> <uu2m6n$37bas$1@dont-email.me>
 <uu2n11$374vn$5@i2pn2.org> <uu2o0v$37bas$7@dont-email.me>
 <uu2o9q$374vo$20@i2pn2.org> <uu2oq3$37bas$9@dont-email.me>
 <uu3l30$3ajo1$2@i2pn2.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2024 15:24:44 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="481a4c8f2cd1b5f60f5d8b2395b87ce0";
	logging-data="3847859"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX196lmmBejpcIFyu72/qA7dv"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:vSIDWONdCo9+qtCUz2O/u8f6RfU=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <uu3l30$3ajo1$2@i2pn2.org>
Bytes: 6049

On 3/28/2024 6:42 AM, Richard Damon wrote:
> On 3/27/24 11:39 PM, olcott wrote:
>> On 3/27/2024 10:31 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>> On 3/27/24 11:26 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>> On 3/27/2024 10:09 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>> On 3/27/24 10:55 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Note, that Levitical ordinance, does NOT carry into the new 
>>>>> coventent, so Paul isn't refering to it.
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The "Sideburns" tend to refer to a somewhat lower place on the 
>>>>>>> side of the face.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So, you are MISTRANSLATING the word.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Also, that was part of the CEREMONIAL Law, a distinctive like 
>>>>>>> circumcision that was done away with.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes you are good on this.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I diligently make sure to totally ignore every law of God that
>>>>>> does not directly or indirectly pertain to loving others as myself.
>>>>>
>>>>> And thus condemn yourself to the lake of FIRE.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *Not if Galatians 5:14 is literally true*
>>>> *Not if Galatians 5:14 is literally true*
>>>> *Not if Galatians 5:14 is literally true*
>>>
>>> Which isn't the way the words were meant.
>>>
>>> That is DEVIL WORSHIP talking
>>>
>>
>> What exactly makes you the judge of this?
> 
> I do my best based on what I know, and issue the warning based on it,
> 
> God will make the final decision.
> 
>>
>>>>
>>>> Galatians 5:14 NRSV
>>>> For the whole law is summed up in a single commandment,
>>>> “You shall love your neighbor as yourself.”
>>>>
>>>>> Which is probably for the better, as you would find Heaven 
>>>>> unbearable with having to willingly follow ALL of Gods Law would be 
>>>>> intolerable.
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Love one another with as much empathy as possible is the only
>>>>>> law of God that I strive to obey. Focusing on anything else
>>>>>> is a dangerous distraction away from righteousness.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> And thus not actually loving your neighor the way you need to.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> How would you know?
>>>> What is your criterion measure?
>>>
>>> Loving as God would love. Which means you need to understand ALL of 
>>> God first, not just the one aspect that you are willing to look at.
>>>
>>
>> Sure simply totally 100% become Christ and then simply love others.
>> Love others as I have loved you...
> 
> You think you CAN become "Christ"?
> 
> Do you understand what that claim entails?
> 
> Do you understand what falsely making that claim means?
> 
Every Christian is required to become as Christ like as they possibly 
can. Love them as I have loved you.

>>
>>>>
>>>> Every denomination believes that they are the one that is
>>>> correct and this cannot possibly be true for every denomination.
>>>> This proves that art least most of them are wrong.
>>>>
>>>>>> It makes loving others with empathy superior guidance because this
>>>>>> screens out self-righteous judgmentalism.
>>>>>
>>>>> But make it so you don't actually need to love them the way you are 
>>>>> told to.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> What exactly make *you* the judge of this?
>>>>
>>>
>>> You wouldn't understand. I am not the actual Judge, but can see how 
>>> the Judge is likely going to look at things.
>>>
>> Ah so you are guessing or estimating.
> 
> No, it isn't a "guess", as the criteria is clearly laid out to those who 
> are willing to make the effort to understand.
> 

If that was true then there would not be differing denominations
of Christ.

> God WILL judge those that oppose his authority, like you are doing.
> 
I don't oppose God's authority. I vehemently oppose the authority of 
fallible humans

Isaiah 64:6 (KJV)
....and all our righteousnesses are as filthy rags;

>>
>>> I see much in what you do that makes it clear that God is not guiding 
>>> your life, and thus you do not understand.
>>
> 

-- 
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer