Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: while(T[l]<p & l<=r)
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2024 19:12:20 +0100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 14
Message-ID: <uu4bu4$3nrfa$2@dont-email.me>
References: <uu109u$3798b$1@i2pn2.org> <uu3kqb$3i23g$1@dont-email.me>
 <kXeNN.99578$24ld.63941@fx07.iad>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2024 18:12:20 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="0a08a487bba2a74163287f88a6183244";
	logging-data="3927530"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+uMppjWxU4AvEdVh/yXykSC84E0gQBpW8="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:WO1b6q/w9AawRJUYPJPervWVu5o=
In-Reply-To: <kXeNN.99578$24ld.63941@fx07.iad>
Content-Language: en-GB
Bytes: 1582

On 28/03/2024 15:14, Scott Lurndal wrote:
> Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> writes:
>> On 27.03.2024 12:35, fir wrote:
>>> tell me, is while(T[l]<p & l<=r) the same as while((T[l]<p)&&(l<=r))
>>
>> 1. As long as K&R precedences still hold you don't need the inner
>> parentheses; '<' and '<=' has higher precedence than '&' and '&&'.
> 
> While true, the parenthesis can be helpful to the reader
> and have no adverse effects.
> 

A couple of space characters would also not go amiss in aiding the reader.