Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<uu7qie$55d$1@panix2.panix.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!news.misty.com!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!panix!.POSTED.panix2.panix.com!panix2.panix.com!not-for-mail
From: kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.written,rec.arts.sf.fandom
Subject: Re: Babel
Date: 30 Mar 2024 01:40:30 -0000
Organization: Former users of Netcom shell (1989-2000)
Lines: 24
Message-ID: <uu7qie$55d$1@panix2.panix.com>
References: <us5st0$485$1@panix2.panix.com> <uu2h7o$p5d$2@reader1.panix.com> <uu4rk8$m7s$1@panix2.panix.com> <c13e0jpli32csrje723obp6db2ee63s3cl@4ax.com>
Injection-Info: reader1.panix.com; posting-host="panix2.panix.com:166.84.1.2";
	logging-data="1517"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@panix.com"
Bytes: 1608

Tim Merrigan  <tppm@ca.rr.com> wrote:
>On 28 Mar 2024 22:40:08 -0000, kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey) wrote:
>
>>Keith F. Lynch <kfl@KeithLynch.net> wrote:
>>>Scott Dorsey <kludge@panix.com> wrote:
>>>> Was Pancho Villa an authorized representative acting on behalf of
>>>> the Mexican government?  Or was he acting as a private citizen?
>>>
>>>Does it matter?  If a bunch of armed foreigners working together cross
>>>the US border to use force against Americans, that's an invasion.
>>
>>What if it's only one armed foreigner?
>>
>>>In 1066, was William the Conquerer an authorized representative acting
>>>on behalf of the French government?
>>
>>He was the French government.  L'etat, c'etait lui.
>
>He was the Norman government, Philip I was the French government.

Yes!  I stand corrected!
--scott
-- 
"C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."