Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<uu8tv5$vk2g$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> Newsgroups: comp.unix.shell,comp.unix.programmer,comp.lang.misc Subject: Re: Command Languages Versus Programming Languages Date: Sat, 30 Mar 2024 12:44:37 +0100 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 18 Message-ID: <uu8tv5$vk2g$1@dont-email.me> References: <uu54la$3su5b$6@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Sat, 30 Mar 2024 11:44:37 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="a727377dea3619238eb5776757160b11"; logging-data="1036368"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/qUDqpsjrxR98Z9PXGZIE2r9mremofUWM=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:q1UycZ3a+3nH7Iy1VnUFwXSWy4M= Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <uu54la$3su5b$6@dont-email.me> Bytes: 1712 On 2024-03-29 02:14, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote: > At one time, we distinguished between “scripting” languages and > “programming” languages. To begin with, the “scripting” languages were > somehow more limited in functionality than full-fledged “programming” > languages. Or they were slower, because they were interpreted. [...] The key difference is that a program in a scripting language need not to be complete or known in order to be executed. The limitations and ugliness of scripting languages is determined by this requirement, but also easiness of use. -- Regards, Dmitry A. Kazakov http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de