Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: Mail-In Voting
Date: Sat, 30 Mar 2024 12:40:17 -0400
Organization: Ph'nglui Mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh Wgah'nagl Fhtagn.
Lines: 101
Message-ID: <uu9f9h$13o15$4@dont-email.me>
References: <68-cndeZBcdJV5n7nZ2dnZfqnPadnZ2d@giganews.com>
 <uu3vv9$3kt4j$1@dont-email.me>
 <atropos-02C92E.10572328032024@news.giganews.com>
 <uu6j76$b577$14@dont-email.me>
 <atropos-C94F52.11271729032024@news.giganews.com>
 <hd5e0jhgvifuqb437hutgp0vl04revgaos@4ax.com>
 <atropos-6BCDD3.13024929032024@69.muaa.rchm.washdctt.dsl.att.net>
 <ZCFNN.99583$24ld.65615@fx07.iad>
Reply-To: fredp1571@gmail.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 30 Mar 2024 16:40:18 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="25ddeebed01c8cd9c05bbadd086500eb";
	logging-data="1171493"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/q+Bl1rz/JVDWCXtE9lqz4"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:78.0)
 Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.0
Cancel-Lock: sha1:m5mO/y4tC391Er1GoeOxuJcTyAA=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <ZCFNN.99583$24ld.65615@fx07.iad>
Bytes: 5175

On 3/29/24 4:36 PM, trotsky wrote:
> On 3/29/24 3:02 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>> In article <hd5e0jhgvifuqb437hutgp0vl04revgaos@4ax.com>,
>>   shawn <nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, 29 Mar 2024 11:27:17 -0700, BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> In article <uu6j76$b577$14@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 3/28/24 1:57 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>> In article <uu3vv9$3kt4j$1@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 3/27/24 9:41 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> France banned mail-in voting in 1975 due to fraud.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Mexico banned mail-in voting in 1992 due to fraud.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Belgium banned mail-in voting in 2018 due to fraud.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Sweden rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Italy rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Ukraine rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Russia and Japan do not permit mail-in voting.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> No Middle Eastern country permits mail-in voting.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> No Latin American country permits mail-in voting.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> In the United States, Democrats love mail-in voting and are trying
>>>>>>>> their damnedest to get instituted everywhere.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Why don't we just go back to making a mark on a piece of broken 
>>>>>>> pottery,
>>>>>>> and put it in a big wine jar?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Because that's WAY better than requesting a ballot online and 
>>>>>>> filling it
>>>>>>> out and putting it in the mail - and then track it online so you 
>>>>>>> can see
>>>>>>> it was received and accepted.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Because one of those ways is a 21st century innovation, and the 
>>>>>>> others
>>>>>>> are as incredibly outdated as stone knives and bear skins.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And yet it'd still be better than what we have now in mail-in
>>>>>> California, where they're *still* counting the March primary 
>>>>>> votes. And
>>>>>> not only does Schiff keep gaining votes, but Garvey seems to 
>>>>>> somehow be
>>>>>> *losing* them.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> How do vote totals for a candidate go down? Only in California...
>>>>>>
>>>>> By math, stupid. The same way they go up.
>>>>
>>>> How do you count ten votes for Garvey and then an hour later reduce the
>>>> total to eight? Did those two mystery votes exist or not? Did you count
>>>> them or not? If you counted them, how could they go away and reduce the
>>>> total?
>>>>
>>>> If someone gives you a pile of apples to count and then periodically
>>>> checks in to see how you're doing, why would there be less apples at 
>>>> the
>>>> last check-in than there were at the first?
>>>
>>> Someone made a mistake in the count in the first place, or someone
>>> counted votes for Garvey but it was provisional and those votes were
>>> later removed. Without hearing from the people responsible there's no
>>> way to know just what happened.
>>
>> It's weird how this only happens to the Republican candidate.
> 
> 
> Is that what happened when Trump lost to Biden too?  Go ahead, complete 
> the lie.
> 
> 
> We didn't
>> see any reduction in votes for Schiff. His numbers only rise. Same with
>> the other Democrat, Katie Porter. Her numbers only go up. Just like
>> trunk ballots always favor the Democrat by some wild coincidence.
> 


I always knew he couldn't read, but I wasn't sure he couldn't count.
Guess we know now.

-- 
"Thou shalt not make a machine in the likeness of a man’s mind." - OC 
Bible  25B.G.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/ek8kap93bmk0q5w/D%20U%20N%20E%20Part%20II.jpg?dl=0

Gracie, age 6.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/0es3xolxka455iw/BetterThingsToDo.jpg?dl=0