Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: fir <fir@grunge.pl>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: seed
Date: Sat, 30 Mar 2024 22:36:28 +0100
Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID: <uua0kn$3imla$1@i2pn2.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 30 Mar 2024 21:36:24 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="3758762"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="+ydHcGjgSeBt3Wz3WTfKefUptpAWaXduqfw5xdfsuS0";
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:27.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/27.0 SeaMonkey/2.24
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
Bytes: 1166
Lines: 14

i wonder if c should not have a seed kwyword ('type qualifier'? of
how to call this

i mean seed is such think you call reallock on ond only that


char* p = realloc(p, 200); //p is a seed

this is becouse you may write soem functions that expect seed

foo(char* p( //seed is expected and only seed

not normal pointer

so this is probably needed and will increase typesafety