Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<uuagic$1eubu$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject: Re: This FOSS Thang :-)
Date: Sat, 30 Mar 2024 22:08:12 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 102
Message-ID: <uuagic$1eubu$1@dont-email.me>
References: <uso2en$184pn$1@solani.org>
 <ug4vui1sog06gsn7r2dep8t32pg539pnc9@4ax.com> <usq48p$dl57$1@dont-email.me>
 <17bc1de93bb4055f$981$3331982$802601b3@news.usenetexpress.com>
 <usr82n$19trd$4@solani.org> <ut4t4o$32464$1@dont-email.me>
 <65f600a1$0$8233$426a74cc@news.free.fr> <utcpgl$10gjc$1@dont-email.me>
 <65fe0bac$0$2988$426a74cc@news.free.fr> <utn78o$3pu1f$1@dont-email.me>
 <66000fa7$0$2559$426a74cc@news.free.fr> <utrqml$133il$1@dont-email.me>
 <6607d57b$0$7525$426a74cc@news.free.fr>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 31 Mar 2024 02:08:12 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="1ef41b42d8b5715ef9ef421d28b20453";
	logging-data="1538430"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX186RwxPuDApva757bvdZpgZY3ypw2ZMbH4="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:9s2hAln30CgwvWPPQa7T4dn+4D0=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <6607d57b$0$7525$426a74cc@news.free.fr>
Bytes: 5827

On 3/30/24 5:03 AM, Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote:
> Le 25-03-2024, -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> a écrit :
>> On 3/24/24 7:33 AM, Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote:
>>> Le 23-03-2024, -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> a écrit :
>>>>
>>>> That does appear to be what you're saying, but it was done without you
>>>> offering objective proof that "your way" actually is more productive,
>>>> either for you or for anyone else.
>>>
>>> I. DON'T. CARE. FOR. ANYONE. ELSE. What part don't you understand? I'm
>>> not an English speaker, I can try to say it in another way if it's
>>> needed.
>>
>> Yes, we know that you only care about yourself.
> 
> No, you don't understand, you can't understand and you'll never been
> able to understand.
> 
> If you did you would have been stopped saying I'm telling my way is better
> for others long ago. That only fact proves you don't try to understand
> what I'm saying. You only want to tell your claim whatever is real about
> it.

If you're not trying to advocate "your way" for others to consider too, 
then why did you post anything at all about it?  That's your doing.

> 
>>> I care for me. My way is better for me. I don't claim my way is better
>>> for others: I just don't care. What don't you understand.
>>
>> Your statement is incorrect: you do care. If you honestly believed that
>> others don't matter then you'd not be evangelizing.
> 
> If I was really evangelizing, you would have been able to answer my only
> question: when did I say anyone to do it my way? You can't everything
> you say is like you: shit.

Take it from a native English speaker:  your posts' statements have been 
evangelical, even if you (as an admitted non-native English language 
speaker) did not intend to write it that way.

> 
>> It is obvious that
>> the reason why you're making such an effort to try to defend your
>> workflow is to try to "sell" it to others.
> 
> You see, you don't try to understand what I'm saying, you only try to
> imagine what I could have said to go in you way when there isn't. The
> only effort I'm making is to be able to keep doing things my way.

You've always been free to keep to your little corner of the world, 
doing things "your way" in your little hole, because that was never the 
point.

>>>> Where the line is drawn is when you recommend to others that they should
>>>> be just as obstinately stupid as you are oh so proudly being.
>>>
>>> When did I recommend to others to do the same? It's the only part of the
>>> discussion I would consider answering if my provider display your
>>> answer.
>>>
>>> Because I don't care if your lack of brain makes you follows the reports
>>> without the ability to understand them. But when you tell I want to
>>> impose my way on others, it's another story.
>>
>> Insult attempts show that you're frustrated because you've not really
>> been listening to what I've been saying. You are entrenched in your ways
>> and closed to new ideas such that you've become stagnant.
> 
> I'm insulting you only because you are distorting what I say to make me
> tells things I disagree with. And that pisses me off. You are an
> insufferable piece of shit. It's neither fun nor interesting.

No, you're trying to insult because you're frustrated.  Perhaps that is 
due to the language barrier, but you're not willing to see that either.
Do better.

> 
> You are everything I despised, a worthless sheep unable to think by
> himself and to try to understand, you only want everyone to be conform
> to is vision of what the TV told him. 

Believe what you must in order to make yourself feel less bad, but 
you're incorrect: acknowledging something isn't an endorsement of it.

> You're neither the first, nor the
> last. A great French band made a song about people like you more than
> forty years ago, that song is still actual.
> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IOAyC6PvVmg>
> I'm won't translate it for you because you wouldn't be able to
> understand it anyway.

Its YA band with a renegade attitude trying to make an angry political 
statement: the old, recurring pattern of rebellion, frustration, etc.

FWIW, if I weren't a Francophile, I'd take the low road & ask why if 
they're so great that no one in USA has ever heard of Préfabriqués /s



-hh