Article <uuej4k$2i9d1$3@dont-email.me>

Warning: mysqli::__construct(): (HY000/1203): User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\includes\artfuncs.php on line 21
Failed to connect to MySQL: (1203) User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections
Warning: mysqli::query(): Couldn't fetch mysqli in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\index.php on line 66
Article <uuej4k$2i9d1$3@dont-email.me>

Deutsch English Français Italiano

<uuej4k$2i9d1$3@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid>
Newsgroups: news.admin.peering
Subject: Re: Quantity and addresses of antique Usenet peers that carry full
 text feeds?
Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2024 15:16:36 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: the-candyden-of-code
Lines: 20
Message-ID: <uuej4k$2i9d1$3@dont-email.me>
References: <b7b4bbbe328a083824ab6ab1a4881b56$1@sybershock.com>
 <uucqou$22f13$2@dont-email.me>
Injection-Date: Mon, 01 Apr 2024 15:16:36 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="4442aefb2186058a1695ec6e7ff07da1";
	logging-data="2696609"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18ijd6YkEPmkc5lSEwY7bSDOtFwv6+XjlFRIj6hScBUYA=="
User-Agent: slrn/pre1.0.4-9 (Linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:UCxQnp7iLjzZAK+AeQAax4NMmDI=
X-Face: b{dPmN&%4|lEo,wUO\"KLEOu5N_br(N2Yuc5/qcR5i>9-!^e\.Tw9?/m0}/~:UOM:Zf]%
 b+ V4R8q|QiU/R8\|G\WpC`-s?=)\fbtNc&=/a3a)r7xbRI]Vl)r<%PTriJ3pGpl_/B6!8pe\btzx
 `~R! r3.0#lHRE+^Gro0[cjsban'vZ#j7,?I/tHk{s=TFJ:H?~=]`O*~3ZX`qik`b:.gVIc-[$t/e
 ZrQsWJ >|l^I_[pbsIqwoz.WGA]<D
Bytes: 1960

Kyonshi <gmkeros@gmail.com> wrote at 23:03 this Sunday (GMT):
> On 3/28/2024 8:11 PM, SugarBug wrote:
>> I wonder how many peers are carrying and preserving fulltext historical and curent Usenet feeds.
>> 
>> Will anyone give a ballpark number?
>> 
>> Which peers have articles remotest in antiquity?
>> 
>> Even guesstimates might be useful.
>> 
>
> The question is how much of that really is useful, considering the flood 
> of spam the last few decades.


There was still plenty of legitimate conversation, and
filtering/skipping the spam should be easier in retrospect. You could
also apply the existing spam reports for a portion of it.
-- 
user <candycane> is generated from /dev/urandom