Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<uuf35f$2m58i$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy Subject: Re: Check If Your Distro Is Vulnerable To XZ Backdoor Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2024 19:50:07 -0000 (UTC) Organization: the-candyden-of-code Lines: 53 Message-ID: <uuf35f$2m58i$1@dont-email.me> References: <17c1daf1b743b4f8$156268$3716115$802601b3@news.usenetexpress.com> <uuc40a$22uoo$1@solani.org> <uuehj4$2htpk$2@dont-email.me> <uues7i$o69$2@solani.org> <uuev29$2l6ri$2@dont-email.me> <uuevej$o69$5@solani.org> <uuf07o$2lfi5$1@dont-email.me> <uuf0er$o69$6@solani.org> <uuf0sp$o69$7@solani.org> <uuf17d$o69$8@solani.org> <uuf1vv$2lse9$1@dont-email.me> <uuf23m$o69$10@solani.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Mon, 01 Apr 2024 19:50:07 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="4442aefb2186058a1695ec6e7ff07da1"; logging-data="2823442"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18V83Ghwt9gflJ39ZEncmKI6+zX1WSyOzeGU9CVSdO1HQ==" User-Agent: slrn/pre1.0.4-9 (Linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:SWG4QtJlRl9tyahQ69NFFdbbI/8= X-Face: b{dPmN&%4|lEo,wUO\"KLEOu5N_br(N2Yuc5/qcR5i>9-!^e\.Tw9?/m0}/~:UOM:Zf]% b+ V4R8q|QiU/R8\|G\WpC`-s?=)\fbtNc&=/a3a)r7xbRI]Vl)r<%PTriJ3pGpl_/B6!8pe\btzx `~R! r3.0#lHRE+^Gro0[cjsban'vZ#j7,?I/tHk{s=TFJ:H?~=]`O*~3ZX`qik`b:.gVIc-[$t/e ZrQsWJ >|l^I_[pbsIqwoz.WGA]<D Bytes: 3246 Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> wrote at 19:32 this Monday (GMT): > On 4/1/24 14:30, candycanearter07 wrote: >> Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> wrote at 19:17 this Monday (GMT): >>> On 4/1/24 14:11, Physfitfreak wrote: >>>> On 4/1/24 14:03, Physfitfreak wrote: >>>>> On 4/1/24 14:00, candycanearter07 wrote: >>>>>> Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> wrote at 18:46 this Monday (GMT): >>>>>>> On 4/1/24 13:40, candycanearter07 wrote: >>>>>>>> which sshd >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I get: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> hydrogen@hydrogen-OptiPlex-7050:~$ which sshd >>>>>>> hydrogen@hydrogen-OptiPlex-7050:~$ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> as if it just ignored it. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Weird, probably means it's not installed.. >>>>> >>>>> I get the same result with command, >>>>> >>>>> which >>>>> >>>>> by itself. So it is something about the command, not sshd. >>>> >>>> >>>> No, the command: which exists of course but requires an argument or >>>> file. I don't know why running it by itself doesn't give error saying it >>>> requires a file or argument. >>>> >>>> It responds to command: which ls as it's supposed to. So sshd, >>>> whatever it is, is certainly not on my system. >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> Does sshd need to be on the system for security? Or is it the sshd >>> itself that has provided a backdoor? >> >> >> Unless you need to remote into your computer, sshd isnt /neccesary/. > > > Oh, ok. I'll uninstall the two packages then. Thanks. No problem. I have it installed as a backup, but leave the server off unless I need it. -- user <candycane> is generated from /dev/urandom