Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<uugv1d$36oe5$5@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject: Re: Why Python When There Is Perl?
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2024 08:51:57 -0400
Organization: None
Lines: 31
Message-ID: <uugv1d$36oe5$5@dont-email.me>
References: <17be420c4f90bfc7$63225$1585792$802601b3@news.usenetexpress.com>
 <utd86u$1ipcj$1@solani.org> <utfo33$1o6mu$3@dont-email.me>
 <l61vaiFn16lU2@mid.individual.net> <utgikt$21nsq$1@dont-email.me>
 <l646ogF2m1hU4@mid.individual.net> <utjv9u$2u8be$1@dont-email.me>
 <utleqa$3993q$2@dont-email.me> <utmic2$3k6u5$10@dont-email.me>
 <utnmea$3tet3$4@dont-email.me> <utpaea$cntv$3@dont-email.me>
 <uuge9n$32hhs$16@dont-email.me>
Reply-To: OFeem1987@teleworm.us
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2024 12:51:58 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="88e26563ce9d41076278c0a45fe2b11e";
	logging-data="3367365"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19KdPG/WmaLqRB3eyoklPnU"
User-Agent: slrn/1.0.3 (Linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:CujpgEJtIk+eDLT9rRBKieMmD50=
X-Slrn: Why use anything else?
X-User-Agent: Microsoft Outl00k, Usenet K00k Editions
X-Mutt: The most widely-used MUA
Bytes: 2490

Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

> On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 09:39:21 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>
>> Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote this copyrighted missive and expects
>> royalties:
>> 
>>> On Sat, 23 Mar 2024 08:36:17 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>>>
>>>> Meh. I have never found another language with the power and
>>>> flexibility of C++. Not Java, not C#, and not Python.
>>>
>>> Python can do homoiconicity.
>> 
>> C++ can do template metaprogramming.
>
> Python doesn’t need two different languages for “compile-time” versus 
> “run-time” programming; it uses the same language for both.

I think that Alexander Stepanov would say..... <braaaaaaaaapppppp>

> Function definitions and class definitions are not declarations: they are 
> just forms of assignment statement.
>
> And then there are metaclasses ...

I wonder if the C++ metaclass proposal ever made it into C++. Will have to
check....

-- 
A gift of a flower will soon be made to you.