Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<uuh6ok$393vp$2@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design Subject: Re: OT: Breeding nextgen Daleks! Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2024 08:03:41 -0700 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 51 Message-ID: <uuh6ok$393vp$2@dont-email.me> References: <uugv8h$37b4f$1@dont-email.me> <uuh0uk$37kl9$1@dont-email.me> <uuh522$38pg5$1@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2024 15:03:49 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="328b1d55c15bae14787bcf4732c7c8ca"; logging-data="3444729"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/U3IKqEGtalQuh0kzPTX/v" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.2.2 Cancel-Lock: sha1:M7Xo/PSB/S8/KjCTjDG+xd+BxJU= Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <uuh522$38pg5$1@dont-email.me> Bytes: 3408 On 4/2/2024 7:34 AM, Martin Brown wrote: > One of my friends has a full size ex BBC one in his living room. We had thought of putting a proper TARDIS in the back yard -- but figured the reference would be lost on most folks. (extra points to make it larger on the inside!!!) > Cybermen were much scarier though because they *could* climb stairs. Even if > they looked a lot like blokes in silver boilersuits with accordions and > plumbing for ears. Modern ones are much tougher looking. The whole problem with Dr Who is that these things just keep recurring. Sort of like the Star Wars trilogies: A swats B; B swats A; A swats B; ... <yawn> Any time-travel-related story too often falls on "let's go to a different time" to get the writers out of a bind and save them from having to think up some truly original plot. The "magic wand" solution. > If you want a really badly made Dr Who alien "The Ark in Space, 1974" is one > such. Amazing what you can do with green paint and bubblewrap. > > https://randomwhoness.com/2016/11/11/imagination-bubble-wrap-and-the-ark-in-space-1974/ > > If you go even further back there were plenty of worse aliens in the likes of > "Plan 9 from Outer Space". A film that was so bad that it became good again and > had a cult following (along with others of that ilk). I can't recall the film > now but another alien was obviously two blokes under a carpet! In the 60's, the introduction of color TV made for some truly silly "aliens" in the sci-fi serieses of the day: Lost in Space, Voyage to the Bottom of the Sea, Star Trek, etc. Often, guys dressed in rubber suits -- that were rePAINTed from one episode to the next to create an entirely new alien! <frown> [we used to make *active* Tribbles in college and drop them in/near folks' beds to be "discovered" when the room had gone quiet enough to sleep] OTOH, Robbie the Robot (/Forbidden Planet/, /The Invisible Boy/, etc.) epitomizes what a robot *should* look like! (though the newest rendering of Marvin is an amusing, modern take -- the original was depressingly pathetic!) And who can forget Godzilla's floppy rubber tail (that defied the physics of scale -- along with everything ELSE on the set!)? Or, the ants in /Them!/?