Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: January 6th Prosecutor Arrested for Stabbing Man in Road Rage Incident
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2024 17:20:51 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 38
Message-ID: <uuhepj$3amuc$2@dont-email.me>
References: <u5ycnfdOvpH0G5b7nZ2dnZfqn_SdnZ2d@giganews.com> <m2rn0jdco5eakk7a02ucfqjrij2nqc0vmv@4ax.com> <uuh7ai$24mf$2@solani.org> <ojbo0j9jbnl9ik70ph6g8gqj37rdo591c7@4ax.com>
Injection-Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2024 17:20:52 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="6cb05cfbee5117f0387e06ca540cd627";
	logging-data="3496908"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19yk214h7cKwdQwToiOB/ep9Mg0aPuFgo4="
Cancel-Lock: sha1:FDiwvBmnLdzlBbc4E4Z1BmXfltg=
X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test77 (Sep 1, 2010)
Bytes: 2761

shawn <nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com> wrote:
>On Tue, 2 Apr 2024 08:13:20 -0700, suzeeq <suzee@imbris.com> wrote:
>>On 4/2/2024 4:30 AM, NoBody wrote:
>>>On Tue, 02 Apr 2024 04:15:37 +0000, BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:

>>>>From prosecutor to defendant. Good luck with that, buddy!

>>>>https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/1774781156933693440/vid/avc1/320x400/MkrNQoMQg_JapL6E.mp4?tag=14

>>>Betcha he gets less of a penalty than people who just walked through
>>>the Capitol.

>>After they broke in.

>And before it is brought up, yes there was the video of a cop standing
>there letting the people in, but what isn't brought up is the people
>were storming the door and he was faced with trying to fight
>tens/hundreds of people trying to get by him and risking serious
>injury or standing aside. I can't blame him for standing aside. 

>You can't say the people didn't know they were doing something wrong
>as everyone one of them had to cross the barricades that had been
>setup around the building. So the fact that the cop stood aside as
>they walked in doesn't mean they weren't breaking the law.

Of course there's an argument. There's always an argument.

Your honor, I make a motion to dismiss the charge. My client was not
trespassing on the grounds of the Capitol. The barriers had not yet been
erected when he entered the Capitol grounds. Prosecution has presented
no evidence that the defendant evaded the barrier.

If he wasn't trespassing on the Capitol grounds, then he wasn't
trespassing having entered the Capitol through an open door. That's a
valid defense and those charges should have been dismissed.

Please don't argue that someone should be prosecuted on the basis of
inference and not evidence,