Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<uul0q6$c4i$1@i2pn2.org> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: fir <fir@grunge.pl> Newsgroups: comp.lang.c Subject: Re: remark on defining size of basic types Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2024 03:46:46 +0200 Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org) Message-ID: <uul0q6$c4i$1@i2pn2.org> References: <uukp2q$2v3$1@i2pn2.org> <uukrfp$7l0f$2@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2024 01:46:47 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: i2pn2.org; logging-data="12434"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org"; posting-account="+ydHcGjgSeBt3Wz3WTfKefUptpAWaXduqfw5xdfsuS0"; User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:27.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/27.0 SeaMonkey/2.24 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 In-Reply-To: <uukrfp$7l0f$2@dont-email.me> Bytes: 1501 Lines: 18 Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote: > On Thu, 04 Apr 2024 01:34:48 +0200, fir wrote: > >> here is a problem in using 64 big ints on windows ... > > #include <stdint.h> > > int64_t signed_64bit_int; > uint64_t unsigned_64bit_int; > > maybe but thats not the point i mean if types (like int.long) vary on different machines and programmers use them - wouldnt it to be better to allow redefine them like in compiler commandline liek -long=64 -long=32 , something like that? (i find it as not much interesting remark, but wonder it that wouldnt be more logical)