Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<uul0q6$c4i$1@i2pn2.org>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: fir <fir@grunge.pl>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: remark on defining size of basic types
Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2024 03:46:46 +0200
Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID: <uul0q6$c4i$1@i2pn2.org>
References: <uukp2q$2v3$1@i2pn2.org> <uukrfp$7l0f$2@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2024 01:46:47 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="12434"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="+ydHcGjgSeBt3Wz3WTfKefUptpAWaXduqfw5xdfsuS0";
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:27.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/27.0 SeaMonkey/2.24
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
In-Reply-To: <uukrfp$7l0f$2@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 1501
Lines: 18

Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
> On Thu, 04 Apr 2024 01:34:48 +0200, fir wrote:
>
>> here is a problem in using 64 big ints on windows ...
>
>      #include <stdint.h>
>
>      int64_t signed_64bit_int;
>      uint64_t unsigned_64bit_int;
>
>
maybe but thats not the point
i mean if types (like int.long) vary on different machines
and programmers use them  - wouldnt it to be better to
allow redefine them like in compiler commandline
liek -long=64 -long=32 , something like that?

(i find it as not much interesting remark, but wonder it that wouldnt be 
more logical)