Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Martin Brown <'''newspam'''@nonad.co.uk>
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
Subject: Re: OT: Dark energy might not be constant at all
Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2024 09:17:23 +0100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 43
Message-ID: <uuoc2m$18vkc$1@dont-email.me>
References: <uuo1hl$5arp$1@solani.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2024 08:17:27 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="98df5e3fdae107ba0e29d1ff508967ca";
	logging-data="1343116"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+SMpT4TTrwHzS34VT4YRR+CzfAWLsU31xbRgcC61f0mg=="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:T2fzLhCBWw0TuTR0cM7JTAMdsLA=
In-Reply-To: <uuo1hl$5arp$1@solani.org>
Content-Language: en-GB
Bytes: 3036

On 05/04/2024 06:17, Jan Panteltje wrote:
> Dark energy might not be constant after all
> First results from the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument offer hints of new physics.
>   https://arstechnica.com/science/2024/04/dark-energy-might-not-be-constant-after-all/

"Dark energy" is the constant that Einstein had to introduce into his 
equations for the Universe to make a "Steady State Universe" model work.

The default solution to Einstein-Lemaitre was an exponentially expanding 
one which he didn't much like. He described it as his greatest mistake 
since reality was much more like his original equation solution as 
Hubble later proved by observation.

It is ironic that with improved observational data the same constant now 
seems to be making the universe fly apart at beyond exponential rate. 
I'm no great fan of "dark energy" but I am told by my friends still in 
the field that it is the least worst option now.

It means matter and radiation in the universe will eventually become 
very very thin indeed as spacetime rips apart ever more rapidly with time.

TBH I'd prefer there to be something wrong with the Type Ia supernovae 
standard candles in the early universe (making them overly bright).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Type_Ia_supernova

I understand that possibility has been ruled out but I don't know any 
more details. They are very handy since when they go off they can 
outshine an entire galaxy and are visible over huge distances.

You can measure the light curve and determine absolute brightness from 
it provided that you catch it early. Amateur astronomers help the 
professionals by monitoring galaxies and reporting events in realtime.

Pro scopes only divert to look at them if there is something to see.
(although there are some professional supernova systems as well)

The idea that the fundamental constants of nature might not be quite 
constant dates back to Dirac who was the first to make that conjecture.

-- 
Martin Brown