Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: Inconvenient lefties
Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2024 09:20:31 -0400
Organization: Ph'nglui Mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh Wgah'nagl Fhtagn.
Lines: 86
Message-ID: <uuotqv$1d3sl$2@dont-email.me>
References: <utks3h$35980$1@dont-email.me>
 <17c2951988fe8093$63098$3121036$c0d58a68@news.newsdemon.com>
 <uuj8q0$3rjq1$2@dont-email.me>
 <17c2cf26c4db72b2$7802$1100308$44d50e60@news.newsdemon.com>
 <uXidnTi_y4kvBpD7nZ2dnZfqn_EAAAAA@giganews.com> <uum1h8$juqp$1@dont-email.me>
 <atropos-E5C583.12321104042024@news.giganews.com>
 <uunfqr$v4iv$1@dont-email.me>
 <atropos-7882FB.18073604042024@news.giganews.com>
Reply-To: fredp1571@gmail.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2024 13:20:32 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="063ea0b658a1ac6b51e979dc5f177e55";
	logging-data="1478549"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19j1psgCc6pARDCdxyZ/ZJE"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:78.0)
 Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.0
Cancel-Lock: sha1:4ECIvT8Hykm9TOUbnpqkd9yGG1I=
In-Reply-To: <atropos-7882FB.18073604042024@news.giganews.com>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 5138

On 4/4/24 9:08 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> In article <uunfqr$v4iv$1@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> 
>> On 4/4/24 3:32 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>> In article <uum1h8$juqp$1@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 4/3/24 2:10 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>> On Apr 3, 2024 at 8:36:11 AM PDT, "moviePig" <never@nothere.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 4/3/2024 5:50 AM, FPP wrote:
>>>>>>>     On 4/2/24 5:52 PM, moviePig wrote:
>>>>>>>>     On 4/2/2024 1:16 AM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
>>>>>>>>>     BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>     Mar 27, 2024 at 3:58:45 PM PDT, moviePig <never@nothere.com>:
>>>>>>>>>>>     3/27/2024 6:57 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>     Adam H. Kerman <ahk@chinet.com>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>     BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why is it that burning the American flag is protected speech,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but if you burn an Alphabet Mafia rainbow flag, you can get
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> arrested for a hate crime?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> You mean a flag that does not belong to you, not your own flag.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> No, I mean any rainbow flag. If you go buy one yourself, then take
>>>>>>>>>>>> it to an anti-troon protest and burn it, it's a hate crime.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> But if you buy an American flag and take it to an Antifa riot and
>>>>>>>>>>>> burn it, protected speech.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The former action is one of hate, the latter is one of protest.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> https://ibb.co/0FpvG4S
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> moviePig is unparseable here. Is he stating that protestors protest
>>>>>>>>> against their friends and not their enemies? I'm so confused.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I'm here to help.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> In general, people who burn an American flag do so in protest of their
>>>>>>>> own government's actions and policies, while those who burn a rainbow
>>>>>>>> flag do so to express their hate of queers.
>>>>>>>     
>>>>>>> If you own it, you can burn it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> But not at a gay-pride march under laws against hate speech.
>>>>>
>>>>> There are no laws against hate speech in the United States. If any
>>>>> legislature should pass such a law, it would be unconstitutional.
>>>
>>>> That was in the old Constitution. You know... the one Roberts, Alito,
>>>> IKavanaugh, and Barret swore up and down they would go by.
>>>> And then didn't.
>>>>
>>>> Settled law, my ass. Alito quoted a 17th century Witch Hunter in his
>>>> draft opinion on Roe (Dobbs).
>>>
>>> Did he? That's awesome!
>>>
>>>> Fuck this Illegitimate Supreme Court of Religious Fanatics.
>>>
>>> This Supreme Court has reinforced free speech over government control
>>> and sanction at nearly every opportunity, so regardless of whether
>>> you're mentally fucking them or not (shudder), don't look for them to
>>> suddenly embrace the notion of carving out a heretofore never before
>>> noticed exception to the 1st Amendment and allow the government to start
>>> suddenly punishing people for 'hate speech'.
> 
>> And your approval of them embracing a 17th century witch hunter tells us
>> everything we need to know
> 
> I think it's hilariously awesome. I wish he'd cited Skynet, too!
> 

Yeah, I kinda thought you would believe rape is "awesome".
Just surprised you admit to it.

-- 
"Thou shalt not make a machine in the likeness of a man’s mind." - OC 
Bible  25B.G.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/ek8kap93bmk0q5w/D%20U%20N%20E%20Part%20II.jpg?dl=0

Gracie, age 6.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/0es3xolxka455iw/BetterThingsToDo.jpg?dl=0