Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<uuq7oh$1muhe$2@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> Newsgroups: news.software.readers Subject: Re: Free / opensource text-only reader for linux - suggestions, please? Date: Sat, 6 Apr 2024 01:16:01 -0000 (UTC) Organization: the-candyden-of-code Lines: 27 Message-ID: <uuq7oh$1muhe$2@dont-email.me> References: <353106c549c5267814e3e2c71aff0b10@www.novabbs.com> <slrnv0u6l4.ql4c.philb@ah61.eternal-september.org> <uuos5b$1co5f$1@dont-email.me> <871q7j60ub.fsf@tilde.institute> Injection-Date: Sat, 06 Apr 2024 01:16:01 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="bad612f9278d4822db42e3d039f9825f"; logging-data="1800750"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19t9a92xsN1cy1nLNxpvYbekdQkcrjVOyq558EmvYwcDA==" User-Agent: slrn/pre1.0.4-9 (Linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:8q0RwzHUcCwxACfCmwtERb3eqiQ= X-Face: b{dPmN&%4|lEo,wUO\"KLEOu5N_br(N2Yuc5/qcR5i>9-!^e\.Tw9?/m0}/~:UOM:Zf]% b+ V4R8q|QiU/R8\|G\WpC`-s?=)\fbtNc&=/a3a)r7xbRI]Vl)r<%PTriJ3pGpl_/B6!8pe\btzx `~R! r3.0#lHRE+^Gro0[cjsban'vZ#j7,?I/tHk{s=TFJ:H?~=]`O*~3ZX`qik`b:.gVIc-[$t/e ZrQsWJ >|l^I_[pbsIqwoz.WGA]<D Bytes: 2461 yeti <yeti@tilde.institute> wrote at 19:55 this Friday (GMT): > candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> > writes: > >> I can't wait for "emacs" to be released as its own distro. > > I already thought some Lisp cycles about using emacs' package manager > for own binaries too. "Own" as in "managing my $HOME", but I never > tried to implement it. It shouldn't have been too complicated as many > emacs "packages" already include C code that gets built at install time. > > But on bad days I think GNU is all about EEE. Embrace, extend, > extinguish. Look at GCC: The GCCisms are so established now that even C > no longer is the universal portable assembler. Far too much stuff can > no longer be built using other compilers. > > Writing my stuff in Org/Babel is not a locked in syndrome of the GCC > level. Org documents stay text and if all else fails, a human can read > and understand that. > > I'm commuting between hating GNU and liking Org/Babel multipe times per > day. At least they don't seem as bad as Ubuntu? -- user <candycane> is generated from /dev/urandom