Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<uuv1rh$30fkk$2@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> Newsgroups: comp.unix.shell,comp.unix.programmer,comp.lang.misc Subject: Re: Command Languages Versus Programming Languages Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2024 21:05:54 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 15 Message-ID: <uuv1rh$30fkk$2@dont-email.me> References: <uu54la$3su5b$6@dont-email.me> <uu636l$7haj$1@dont-email.me> <20240329084454.0000090f@gmail.com> <uu6om5$cmv8$1@dont-email.me> <20240329101248.556@kylheku.com> <uu6t9h$dq4d$1@dont-email.me> <20240329104716.777@kylheku.com> <uu8p02$uebm$1@dont-email.me> <20240330112105.553@kylheku.com> <uudrfg$2cskm$1@dont-email.me> <87r0fp8lab.fsf@tudado.org> <uuehdj$2hshe$1@dont-email.me> <87wmpg7gpg.fsf@tudado.org> <LISP-20240402085115@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> <LISP-20240402091729@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> <wrap-20240402092558@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> <uui7hf$3gona$1@dont-email.me> <uuj1o5$3pvnq$1@dont-email.me> <87plv6jv1i.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <wwv5xwyifq8.fsf@LkoBDZeT.terraraq.uk> <if-20240404121825@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> <uund4g$ugsb$1@dont-email.me> <uup8ul$1fr2t$1@dont-email.me> <uuq0a3$1lcgf$1@dont-email.me> <uuruuc$26nd1$1@dont-email.me> <uus4fe$27r8r$1@dont-email.me> <uusgba$2ao2m$1@dont-email.me> <uuu7t8$2q6uq$1@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Sun, 07 Apr 2024 21:05:54 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="edc206e7c881f15813a37489a3e0be36"; logging-data="3161748"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+7yZKg1vu+IGrJixgkQ5aq" User-Agent: Pan/0.155 (Kherson; fc5a80b8) Cancel-Lock: sha1:L3gMmV0DIQO9SQ/SqbJyg4PsLlE= Bytes: 2528 On Sun, 7 Apr 2024 14:43:04 +0100, Andy Walker wrote: > I can see no argument for saying that [“Algol”], by default, refers to > A60. “Wirth-Hoare Algol”, a.k.a. “Algol-W” (the precursor of Pascal) was a derivative of Algol-60, not Algol-68 (which didn’t exist yet). “Burroughs Algol” was an implementation of Algol-60, not Algol-68. Even in the 21st century, articles like <https://seattlewebsitedevelopers.medium.com/algol-the-language-that-influenced-the-future-cfec9a3e2a4c> can say Generally called ALGOL 60, ALGOL had three major updates ...